Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics (152 page)

Kopecek, Thomas A. “Review of Marcel Metzger,
Les Constitutions Apostoliques
, vol. 1.”
JTS
38 (1987): 209.

Koschorke, Klaus.
Die Polemik der Gnostiker gegen das kirchliche Christentum
. Leiden: Brill, 1978.

Kotrc, Ronald F., and K. R. Walters. “A Bibliography of the Galenic Corpus.”
Transactions and Studies of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia
5.1 (1979): 256–304.

Kraemer, Ross, and Shira L. Lander. “Perpetua and Felicitas.” In
The Early Christian World
, vol. 2, edited by Philip Esler, pp. 1048–65. Routledge Worlds Series. London: Taylor & Francis, 2000.

Kraus, Thomas J., and Tobias Nicklas, eds.
Das Petrusevangelium und die Petrusapokalypse: Die griechischen Fragmente mit deutscher und englischer Übersetzung
. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2004.

Krauter, Stefan. “Was ist ‘schlechte’ Pseudepigraphie? Mittel, Wirkung und Intention von Pseudepigraphie in den Epistolae Senecae ad Paulum et Pauli ad Senecam.” In
Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen
, edited by Jörg Frey et al., pp. 765–85.

Krentz, Edgar. “A Stone That Will Not Fit: The Non-Pauline Authorship of Second Thessalonians.” In
Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen
, edited by Jörg Frey et al., pp. 439–70.

Krentz, Edgar. “Thessalonians, First and Second Epistles to the.”
ABD
6.517–23.

Krusch, B. “Reimser Remigius Fälschungen.”
Neues Archiv Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde
20 (1895): 531–37.

Lambert, David. “The Pseudonymity of Salvian’s Timothy ad Ecclesiam.”
StPatr
38 (2001): 422–428.

Lambot, C. “L’écrit attribute à S. Augustin
Adversus Fulgentium Donatistam.” RBén
58 (1948): 177–222.

Lampe, G. W. H. “The Trial of Jesus in the Acta Pilati.” In
Jesus and the Politics of His Day
, edited by E. Bammel, pp. 173–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

Laub, Franz. “Falsche Verfasserangaben in neutestamentlichen Schriften: Aspekte der gegenwärtigen Diskussion um die neutestamentliche Pseudepigraphie.”
TTZ
89 (1980): 228–41.

Lechner, Thomas.
Ignatius adversus Valentinianos? Chronologische und theologiegeschichtliche Studien zu den Briefen des Ignatius von Antiochen
. VCSup, 47. Leiden: Brill, 1999.

Legras, Bernard. “La sanction du plagiat littéraire en droit grec et hellénistique.” In
Symposion 1999 (Pazo de Mariñan, 6–9 septembre 1999
), edited by E. Cantarella and G. Thür, pp. 443–61. Cologne-Weimar-Vienne: Böhlau, 2003.

Leipoldt, Johannes.
Das Evangelium nach Thomas
. TU 101. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1967.

Lémonon, Jean-Pierre.
Pilate et le gouvernement de la Judée: textes et monuments
. Paris: J. Gabalda, 1981.

Leppä, Outi.
The Making of Colossians: A Study on the Formation and Purpose of a Deutero-Pauline Letter
. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2003.

Leutholf, J.
Ad suam Historiam Aethiopicam antehac editam Commentarius
. Frankfurt am Main, 1691.

Lewis, F. W. “Note on the Date of the First Epistle of Peter.”
The Expositor
5, 10 (1899): 319–20.

Liénard, Édmond. “Sur la Correspondance Apocryphe de Sénèque et de Saint-Paul.”
RBPh
11 (1932): 5–23.

Lienhard, Joseph.
Contra Marcellum: Marcellus of Ancyra and Fourth-Century Theology
. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America, 1999.

Lieu, Judith.
I, II, and III John: A Commentary
. NTL. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2008.

Lightfoot, J. B.
The Apostolic Fathers: Clement, Ignatius, and Polycarp
. 5 vols. London: Macmillan, 1889–90.

Lightfoot, J. B.
St. Paul’s Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon
. London: Macmillan, 1904.

Lightfoot, J. B.
Saint Paul’s Epistle to the Philippians
, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1869.

Lincoln, Andrew T.
Ephesians
. WBC 42. Dallas: Word Books, 1990.

Lindemann, Andreas. “Antwort auf die ‘Thesen zur Echtheit und Datierung der sieben Briefe des Ignatius von Antiochien.’”
ZAC
1 (1997): 185–95.

Lindemann, Andreas.
Die Aufhebung der Zeit: Geschichtsverständnis und Eschatologie im Epheserbrief
. Güttersloh: Gerd Mohn, 1975.

Lindemann, Andreas.
Paulus im ältesten Christentum: Das Bild des Apostels und die Rezeption der paulinischen Theologie in der frühchristlichen Literatur bis Marcion
. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1979.

Lindemann, Andreas. “Zum Abfassungszweck des Zweiten Thessalonicherbriefes.”
ZNW
68 (1977): 35–47.

Lipsius, R. A. “Der Märtyrertod Polykarps.”
ZWT
17 (1874): 188–214.

Löhr, Winrich. “
Der Brief der Gemeinden von Lyon und Vienne (Eusebius, h.e. V, 1–2(4))
.”
Oecumenica et patristica
, 1989, pp. 135–49.

Looks, Carston.
Das Anvertraute bewahren: Die Rezeption der Pastoralbriefe im 2 Jahrhundert
. Munich: Hebert Utz, 1999.

Louw, Johannes P., and Eugene Nida, eds.
Lexical Semantics of the Greek New Testament
. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1992.

Lüdemann, Gerd. “Anti-Paulinism in the Pseudo-Clementines.” In
Opposition to Paul in Jewish Christianity
, edited by G. Lüdemann and Eugene Boring, pp. 169–94. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989.

Luttikhuizen, Gerard P. “The Apocryphal Correspondence with the Corinthians and the Acts of Paul.” In
The Apocryphal Acts of Paul and Thecla
, edited by Jan Bremmer, pp. 75–92. Kampen: Pharos, 1996.

Luttikhuizen, Gerard P. “The Suffering Jesus and the Invulnerable Christ in the Gnostic
Apocalypse of Peter
.” In
The Apocalypse of Peter
, edited by Jan Bremmer and István Czachesz, pp. 187–99. Leuven: Peeters, 2003.

MacDonald, Dennis Ronald.
The Legend and the Apostle: The Battle for Paul in Story and Canon
. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1983.

MacDonald, Margaret Y.
Colossians and Ephesians
. SP 17. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2000.

MacDonald, Margaret Y.
The Pauline Churches: A Socio-Historical Study of Institutionalization in the Pauline and Deutero-Pauline Writings
. SNTSMS 34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Mackowiak, P. Wenzeslaus Sadok.
Die Ethische Beurteilung der Notlüge in der altheidnischen, patristischen, scholastischen, und neueren Zeit
. Zolkiew: Verlag der Dominakamer, 1933.

Malherbe, Abraham J.
The Letters to the Thessalonians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary
. ABC 32B. New York: Doubleday, 2000.

Manson, T. W. “St Paul in Greece.”
BLJR
35 (1952–53): 428–47.

Marjanen, Antti. “Thomas and Jewish Religious Practices.” In
Thomas at the Crossroads: Essays on the Gospel of Thomas
, edited by Risto Uro, pp. 163–82. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1998.

Marrou, H. I. “Review of H. von Campenhausen, ‘Bearbeitungen und Interpolationen des Polykarpmartyriums.’”
TLZ
84 (1959): 361–63.

Marshall, I. Howard.
The Pastoral Epistles
. ICC. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1999.

Martin Hogan, Karina. “Pseudepigraphy and the Periodization of History in Jewish Apocalypses.” In
Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen
, edited by Jörg Frey et al., pp. 61–83.

Martin, Troy.
By Philosophy and Empty Deceit: Colossians as Response to a Cynic Critique
. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.

Martyn, J. Louis.
History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel
. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.

Marxsen, Willi.
Der zweite Thessalonicherbrief
. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 1982.

Masson, F.
Histoire critique de la république des lettres
. Tome X. Utrecht: Chès Guillaume à Poolsum, 1714.

Matthews, Chris. “Review of J. Wehnert,
Die Wir-Passagen der Apostelgeschichte
.”
JBL
110 (1991): 355–57.

Mayer, H. H.
Über die Pastoralbriefe
. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1913.

Mayerhoff, E. T.
Der Brief an die Colosser mit vornehmlicher Berüchsichtigung der drei Pastoralbriefe
. Berlin: Hermann Schültz, 1838.

McCant, Jerry. “The Gospel of Peter: Docetism Reconsidered.”
NTS
30 (1984): 258–73.

McDowell, D.
Aristophanes and Athens: An Introduction to the Plays
. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

McNabb, V. “Date and Influence of the First Epistle of St. Peter.”
Irish Ecclesiastical Record
45 (1935): 596–613.

Meade, David G.
Pseudonymity and Canon: An Investigation into the Relationship of Authorship and Authority in Jewish and Earliest Christian Tradition
. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1985.

Merkle, Stefan. “The Truth and Nothing but the Truth: Dictys and Dares.” In
The Novel in the Ancient World
, edited by G. Schmeling, pp. 564–80. Leiden: Brill, 1996.

Merz, Annette. “The Fictitious Self-Exposition of Paul: How Might Intertextual Theory Suggest a Reformulation of the Hermeneutics of Pseudepigraphy?” In
The Intertextuality of the Epistles: Explorations of Theory and Practice
, edited by Thomas L. Brodie, Dennis Ronald MacDonald, and Stanley E. Porter, pp. 113–32. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2006.

Merz, Annette.
Die fiktive Selbstauslegung des Paulus: Intertextuelle Studien zur Intention und Rezeption der Pastoralbriefe
. Göttingen/Fribourg: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht/Academic Press, 2004.

Methuen, Charlotte. “Widows, Bishops and the Struggle for Authority in the
Didascalia Apostolorum
.”
JEH
46 (1995): 197–213.

Metzger, Bruce M.
The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance
. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.

Metzger, Bruce M. “Literary Forgeries and Canonical Pseudepigrapha.”
JBL
91 (1972): 3–24.

Metzger, Marcel.
Les constitutions apostoliques
. SC 320, 329, 336. Paris: Cerf, 1985, 1986, 1987.

Metzger, Marcel. “La theologie des Constitutions apostoliques par Clément.”
RevScRel
57 (1983): 29–49.

Meyer, Arnold. “Religiöse Pseudepigraphie als ethisch-psychologisches Problem.”
ZNW
35 (1936): 262–79; earlier in
Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie
86 (1932): 171–90.

Meyers, Eric, and James Strange.
Archaeology, the Rabbis and Early Christianity
. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1981.

Michaelis, Wilhelm. “Pastoralbriefe und Wortstatistik.”
ZNW
28 (1929): 69–76.

Miller, James D.
The Pastoral Epistles as Composite Documents
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Minns, Denis. “The Rescript of Hadrian.” In
Justin Martyr and His Worlds
, edited by Sara Parvis and Paul Foster, pp. 38–49. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007.

Mirecki, Paul. “Peter, Gospel of.”
ABD
, 5. 278–81.

Mirkovic, Alexander.
Prelude to Constantine: The Abgar Tradition in Early Christianity
. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2004.

Mitchell, Margaret M. “Corrective Composition, Corrective Exegesis: The Teaching on Prayer in 1 Tim 2, 1–15.” In
1 Timothy Reconsidered
, edited by Karl Paul Donfried, pp. 41–62. Leuven: Peeters, 2008.

Mitchell, Margaret M. “The Letter of James as a Document of Paulinism?” In
Reading James with New Eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of James
, edited by Robert L. Webb and John S. Kloppenborg, pp. 75–98. London: T&T Clark, 2007.

Mitchell, Stephen. “Maximinus and the Christians in
A.D.
312: A New Latin Inscription.”
JRS
78 (1988): 105–24.

Mitton, C. L.
The Epistle to the Ephesians: Its Authorship, Origin and Purpose
. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1951.

Mitton, C. L. “The Relationship Between 1 Peter and Ephesians.”
JTS
1 (1950): 67–73.

Momigliano, Arnaldo. “The New Letter by ‘Anna’ to ‘Seneca.’”
Athenaeum
63 (1985): 217–19.

Montanari, Franco. “Zenodotus, Aristarchus and the Ekdosis of Homer.” In
Editing Texts
, edited by Glenn W. Most, pp. 1–21. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1998.

Morgan, Teresa.
Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Morton, A. Q., and J. McLeman.
Paul: The Man and the Myth
. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.

Moss, Candida R. “On the Dating of Polycarp: Rethinking the Place of the
Martyrdom of Poly-carp
in the History of Christianity.”
Early Christianity
1 (2010): 539–74.

Muddiman, John.
The Epistle to the Ephesians
. Black’s New Testament Commentaries. London: Continuum, 2001.

Mueller, Joseph G.
L’ancien testament dans l’ecclésiologie des Pères
. Turnhout: Brepols, 2004.

Mueller, Joseph G. “The Ancient Church Order Literature: Genre or Tradition?”
JECS
15 (2007): 337–80.

Mülke, M.
Der Autor und sein Text: Die Verfälschung des Originals im Urteil antiker Untersuchungen
. Unterschungen zur Antiken Literatur und Geschichte 93. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.

Müller, Carl Werner. “Die neuplatonischen Aristoteleskommentatoren über die Ursachen der Pseudepigraphie.”
Rheinisches Museum für Philologie
112 (1969): 120–26; reprinted in
Pseudepigraphie in der heidnischen und jüdisch-christlichen Antike
, ed. Norbert Brox, pp. 264–71.

Müller, Gregor.
Die Wahrhaftigkeitspflicht und die Problematik der Lüge: Ein Längsschnitt durch die Moraltheologie und Ethik unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Tugendlehre des Thomas von Aquin und der modernen Lösungsversuche
. Freiburg: Herder, 1962.