Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics (151 page)

Hall, Robert G. “The
Ascension of Isaiah:
Community Situation, Date, and Place in Early Christianity.”
JBL
109 (1990): 289–306.

Hammond Bammel, Caroline. “Ignatian Problems.”
JTS
33 (1982): 66–97.

Hannah, Darrell D. “The Ascension of Isaiah and Docetic Christology.”
VC
53 (1999): 165–96.

Hannah, Darrell D. “Isaiah’s Vision in the Ascension of Isaiah and the Early Church.”
JTS
50 (1999): 80–101.

Hannah, Jack W. “The Setting of the Ignatian Long Recension.”
JBL
79 (1960): 221–38.

Hanson, Ann Ellis. “Galen: Author and Critic.” In
Editing Texts, Texte edieren
, edited by Glenn W. Most, pp. 22–53. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1998.

Hanson, R. P. C.
Allegory and Event: A Study of the Sources and Significance of Origen’s Interpretation of Scripture
. Richmond, VA: John Knox, 1959.

Harnack, Adolf von.
Apocrypha IV. Die apokryphen Briefe des Paulus an die Laodicener und Korinther
, 2nd. Ed. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1931.

Harnack, Adolf von.
Bruchstücke des Evangeliums und der Apokalypse des Petrus
. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1893.

Harnack, Adolf von.
Die Chronologie der altchristlichen Litteratur bis Eusebius
. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1897–1904.

Harnack, Adolf von.
Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur bis Eusebius, vols. 1–2
. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1958; original 1897.

Harnack, Adolf von.
Die Lehre der zwölf Apostel nebst Untersuchungen zur ältesten Geschichte der Kirchenverfassung und des Kirchenrechts. TU 2.1
Leipzig: J. Hinrichs, 1984.

Harnack, Adolf von.
Marcion: Das Evangelium vom fremden Gott; eine Monographie zur Geschichte der Grundlegung der Katholischen Kirche
. Leipzig: J. Hinrichs, 1924.

Harnack, Adolf von. “Review of James Westfall Thompson, ‘The Alleged Persecution.’”
TLZ
3 (1913): 74–77.

Harnack, Adolf von. “‘We’ and ‘I’ Passages in Luke-Acts.”
NTS
3 (1957): 128–32.

Harris, William.
Ancient Literacy
. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.

Harrison, P. N.
The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles
. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1921.

Haufe, Günter. “Gnostische Irrlehre und ihre Abwehr in den Pastoralbriefen.” In
Gnosis und Neues Testament: Studien aus Religionswissenschaft und Theologie
, edited by Karl-Wolfgang Tröger, pp. 325–99. Güterslow: Gütersloher Verlagshaus Mohn, 1973.

Havelaar, Henriette W., ed.
The Coptic Apocalypse of Peter (Nag-Hammadi Codex VII, 3
). Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1999.

Heffernan, Thomas J. “Philology and Authorship in the
Passio Sanctorum Perpetuae et Felicitatis.” Traditio
50 (1995): 315–25.

Hengel, Martin. “Anonymität, Pseudepigraphie und ‘Literarische Fälschung’ in der Jüdisch-Hellenistischen Literatur.” In
Pseudepigrapha I: Pseudopythagorica, Lettres de Platon, Littérature pseudépigraphique juive
, edited by Kurt von Fritz, pp. 231–308. Vandoeuvres-Genève: Fondation Hardt pour l’Étude de l’Antiquité Classique, 1972.

Hengel, Martin.
The Four Gospels and the One Gospel of Jesus Christ: An Investigation of the Collection and Origin of the Canonical Gospels
. London: SCM Press, 2000.

Hengel, Martin. “Der Jakobusbrief als antipaulinische Polemik.” In
Tradition and Interpretation in the NT: Essays in Honor of E. Earle Ellis
, edited by G. Hawthorne and Otto Betz, pp. 248–78. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1987.

Henne, P. “La datation du Canon de Muratori.”
RB
100 (1993): 54–75.

Hercer, R.
Epistolographi Graeci
. Paris: A. F. Didot, 1873; reprinted Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert, 1965.

Herzer, Jens. “Fiction oder Tauschung? Zur Diskussion über die Pseudepigraphie der Pastoralbriefe.” In
Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen
, edited by Jörg Frey et al., pp. 489–536.

Herzer, Jens.
Petrus oder Paulus? Studien über das Verhältnis des Ersten Petrusbriefes zur paulinischen Tradition
. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1998.

Herzer, Jens. “Rearranging the ‘House’ of God: A New Perspective on the Pastoral Epistles.” In
Empsychoi logoi—Religious Innovations in Antiquity: Studies in Honour of Pieter Willem van der Horst
, edited by Alberdina Houtman, A. F. De Jong, and M. Misset-Van De Weg, pp. 547–66. Leiden: Brill, 2008.

Hezser, Catherine.
Jewish Literacy in Roman Palestine
. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.

Hilgenfeld, A. “Die beiden Briefe an die Thessalonicher.”
ZWT
5 (1862): 225–64.

Hilgenfeld, A. “Das Petrus-Evangelium über Leiden und Auferstehung Jesu.”
ZNW
36 (1893): 439–54.

Hilhorst, Anthony. “The
Apocalypse of Paul:
Previous History and Afterlife.” In
The Visio Pauli and the Gnostic Apocalypse of Paul
, edited by Jan Bremmer and István Czachesz, pp. 1–22. Leuven: Peeters, 2007.

Hilhorst, Anthony. “The
Epistola Anne ad Senecam:
Jewish or Christian?” in G. J. M. Bartelink et al., eds.,
Eulogia. mélanges offerts à Antoon A.R. Bastiaensen à l’occasion de son soixante-cinquième anniversaire
, pp. 147–61. Steenbrugge: Abbatia S. Petri, 1991.

Hilhorst, Anthony. “Tertullian on the Acts of Paul.” In
The Apocryphal Acts of Paul and Thecla
, edited by Jan Bremmer, pp. 150–63. Kampen: Pharos, 1996.

Hill, Charles E. “The Debate over the Muratorian Fragment and the Development of the Canon.”
WTJ
57 (1995): 437–52.

Hill, Charles E. “The
Epistula Apostolorum:
An Asian Tract from the Time of Polycarp.”
JECS
7 (1999): 1–53.

Hills, Julian.
Tradition and Composition in the Epistula Apostolorum
. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990.

Hock, Ronald.
The Infancy Gospels of James and Thomas
. Santa Rosa, CA: Polebridge, 1995.

Hoehner, Harold W.
Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary
. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2002.

Holland, Glenn S. “‘A Letter Supposedly from Us’: A Contribution to the Discussion About the Authorship of 2 Thessalonians.” In
The Thessalonian Correspondence
, edited by Raymond F. Collins, pp. 94–402. Leuven: Peters, 1990.

Holtzmann, Heinrich J.
Lehrbuch der historisch-kritischen Einleitung in das Neuen Testament
, 3rd ed. Freiburg: Mohr Siebeck, 1892.

Holtzmann, Heinrich J.
Die Pastoralbriefe, kritisch und exegetisch behandelt
. Leipzig: Englemann, 1880.

Honigman, Sylvie.
The Septuagint and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria: A Study in the Narrative of the Letter of Aristeas
. London: Routledge, 2003.

Hooker, Morna. “Were There False Teachers in Colossae?” In
Christ and the Spirit in the New Testament
, edited by Barnabas Lindars and Stephen S. Smalley, pp. 315–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.

Hopfner, Theodor.
Über die Geheimlehren von Jamblichus
. Leipzig: Theosophisches Verlagshaus, 1922.

Hornschuh, Manfred.
Studien zur Epistula Apostolorum
. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1965.

Hose, M.
Kleine griechische Literaturgeschichte
. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1999.

Hovhanessian, Vahan.
Third Corinthians: Reclaiming Paul for Christian Orthodoxy
. New York: Peter Lang, 2000.

Hübner, R. M. “Thesen zur Echtheit und Datierung der sieben Briefe des Ignatius Antiochien.”
ZAC
1 (1997): 44–72.

Hughes, Frank Witt.
Early Christian Rhetoric and 2 Thessalonians
. JSNTSup, 30. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1989.

Hüneburg, Martin. “Paulus versus Paulus: Der Epheserbrief als Korrektur des Kolosser-briefes.” In
Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen
, edited by Jörg Frey et al., pp. 387–409.

Hunzinger, Claus-Hunno. “Babylon als Deckname für Rom. und die Datierung des 1 Petrusbriefes.” In
Gottes Wort und Gottes Land
, edited by Henning Graf Reventlow, pp. 67–77. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1965.

Izydorczyk, Z.
The Medieval Gospel of Nicodemus: Texts, Intertexts, and Contexts in Western Europe
. Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 158. Tempe: Arizona State University, 1997.

Jackson-McCabe, Matt.
Logos and Law in the Letter of James: The Law of Nature, the Law of Moses, and the Law of Freedom
. Leiden: Brill, 2001.

Jackson-McCabe, Matt. “The Politics of Pseudepigraphy and the Letter of James.” In
Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen
, edited by Jörg Frey et al., pp. 599–623.

James, Montague R. “A New Text of the Apocalypse of Peter.”
JTS
12 (1910/11): 36–54, 362–83, 573–83.

Janssen, Martina.
Unter falschem Namen: Eine kritische Forschungbilanz frühchristlicher Pseudepigraphie
. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2003.

Janssen, Martina. “Antike (Selbst-)Aussagen über Beweggründe zur Pseudepigraphie.” In
Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen
, edited by Jörg Frey et al., pp. 125–79.

Jewett, Robert.
The Thessalonian Correspondence
. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1986.

Johnson, Luke Timothy.
The First and Second Letters to Timothy
. ABC 35A. New York: Doubleday, 2001.

Johnson, Luke Timothy. “First Timothy 1, 1–20: The Shape of the Struggle.” In
1 Timothy Reconsidered
, edited by Karl Paul Donfried, pp. 19–39. Leuven: Peeters, 2008.

Johnson, Luke Timothy.
The Letter of James
. ABC 37A. New York: Doubleday, 1995.

Johnson, Luke Timothy. “II Timothy and the Polemic against False Teachers: A Reexamination.”
JRelS
6 (1978): 1–26.

Johnston, Steve. “La Correspondance apocryphe entre Paul et les Corinthiens: un Pseudépigraphe paulinien au service de la polémique anti-gnostique de la fin du II siècle.” M.A. thesis, University of Laval, 2004.

Joly, Robert.
Le Dossier d’Ignace d’Antioche
. Université libre de Bruxelles, Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres 69. Brussels: Éditions de l’université de Bruxelles, 1979.

Jones, F. Stanley. “An Ancient Jewish Christian Rejoinder to Luke’s Acts of the Apostles: Pseudo-Clementine
Recognitions
1.27–71.”
Semeia
80 (1997): 223–45.

Jones, F. Stanley.
An Ancient Jewish Christian Source on the History of Christianity Pseudo-Clementine “Recognitions” 1.27–71
. SBL Texts and Translations 37, Christian Apocrypha Series 2. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1995.

Jones, F. Stanley. “Introduction to the
Pseudo-Clementines
.” In
Pseudoclementina Elchasaiticaque inter Judaeochristiana: Collected Studies
. Edited by eidem. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 203; Leuven: Peeters, in press.

Jones, F. Stanley. “Jewish Christianity of the
Pseudo-Clementines
.” In
Companion to Second-Century Christian ‘Heretics
,’ edited by Antti Marjanen and Petri Luomanen, pp. 315–34. Leiden: Brill, 2005.

Jones, F. Stanley. “Marcionism in the Pseudo-Clementines.” In
Poussières de christianisme et de judaïsme antiques
, edited by A. Frey and R. Gounelle, pp. 225–44. Prahins: Editions du Zèbre, 2007.

Jones, F. Stanley. “The Pseudo-Clementines: A History of Research.”
SecCent
2 (1982): 1–33, 63–96.

Jülicher, A. and E. Fascher.
Einleitung in das NT
, 7th ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1931.

Kaestli, Jean-Daniel. “Mémoire et pseudépigraphie dans le christianisme.”
Revue de théologie et de philosophie
125 (1993): 41–63.

Kaestli, Jean-Daniel. “La place du Fragment de Muratori dans l’histoire du canon. À propos de la thèse de Sundberg et Hahneman.”
Cristianesimo nella storia
15 (1994): 609–34.

Karris, Robert J. “The Background and Significance of the Polemic of the Pastoral Epistles.”
JBL
92 (1973): 549–63.

Keim, Theodor.
Aus dem Urchristenthum: geschichtliche Untersuchungen
. Zurich: Orell Fsli, 1978.

Keith, Chris.
The Pericope Adulterae, the Gospel of John, and the Literacy of Jesus
. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2009.

Kelley, Nicole.
Knowledge and Religious Authority in the Pseudo-Clementines: Situating the Recognitions in Fourth Century Syria
. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.

Kelley, Nicole. “Problems of Knowledge and Authority in the Pseudo-Clementine Romance of
Recognitions
.”
JECS
13 (2005): 315–48.

Keresztes, Paul. “The Emperor Antoninus Pius and the Christians.”
JEH
22 (1971): 1–18.

Kern, F. H.
Der Charackter und Ursprung des Briefs Jakobi
. Tübingen: Fues, 1835.

Kertelge, K.
Gemeinde und Amt im Neuen Testament
. München: Kösel, 1972.

Kiley, Mark.
Colossians as Pseudepigraphy
. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1986.

Kirk, Alan. “The Johannine Jesus in the Gospel of Peter: A Social Memory Approach.” In
Jesus in Johannine Tradition
, edited by R. T. Fortna and T. Thatcher, pp. 313–22. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2001.

Klijn, A. F. J. “The Apocryphal Correspondence between Paul and the Corinthians.”
VC
17 (1963): 2–23.

Knight, Jonathan.
Disciples of the Beloved One: The Christology, Social Setting and Theological Context of the Ascension of Isaiah
. JSPSup 18. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.

Knust, Jennifer.
Abandoned to Lust: Sexual Slander and Ancient Christianity
. New York: Columbia University, 2005.

Konradt, Matthias. ‘“Jakobus, der Gerechte’: Erwägungen zur Verfasserfiktion des Jakobusbriefes.” In
Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen
, edited by Jörg Frey et al., pp. 575–96.

Konradt, Matthias. “Der Jakobusbrief als Brief des Jakobus.” In
Der Jakobusbrief: Beiträge zur Rehabilitierung der “strohernen Epistel
,” edited by Petra von Gemünden, Matthias Konradt, and Gerd Theissen, pp. 16–53. Münster: Lit Verlag, 2003.