Unruly Places: Lost Spaces, Secret Cities, and Other Inscrutable Geographies

Table of Contents

Title Page

Table of Contents

Copyright

Dedication

Introduction

LOST SPACES

Sandy Island

Leningrad

Arne

Old Mecca

New Moore

Time Landscape

The Aralqum Desert

HIDDEN GEOGRAPHIES

The Labyrinth

Zheleznogorsk

The Underground Cities of Cappadocia

Fox Den

North Cemetery, Manila

North Sentinel Island

NO MAN’S LANDS

Between Border Posts (Guinea and Senegal)

Bir Tawil

Nahuaterique

Twayil Abu Jarwal

Traffic Island

DEAD CITIES

Wittenoom

Kangbashi

Kijong-dong

Ağdam

Pripyat

The Archaeological Park of Sicilian Incompletion

SPACES OF EXCEPTION

Camp Zeist

Geneva Freeport

Bright Light, 4 Mures Street, Bucharest

International Airspace

Gutterspace

Bountiful

Mount Athos

Ranch of Sprouts: Brotas Quilombo

FARC-controlled Colombia

Hobyo

ENCLAVES AND BREAKAWAY NATIONS

Baarle-Nassau and Baarle-Hertog

Chitmahals

Sealand

United Kingdom of Lunda Tchokwe

Gagauzia

FLOATING ISLANDS

Pumice and Trash Islands

Nipterk P-32 Spray Ice Island

The Floating Maldives

The World

EPHEMERAL PLACES

Hog’s Back Lay-By

LAX Parking Lot

Nowhere

Stacey’s Lane

Conclusion: Sympathy for a Place-Loving Species

Bibliography

Acknowledgments

Index

About the Author

First U.S. edition

 

Copyright © 2014 by Alastair Bonnett

Illustrations copyright © 2014 by Lauren Nassef

 

All rights reserved

 

For information about permission to reproduce selections from this book, write to Permissions, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, 215 Park Avenue South, New York, New York 10003.

 

www.hmhco.com

 

First published in Great Britain in 2014 by Aurum Press

 

The Library of Congress has cataloged the print edition as follows:
Bonnett, Alastair, date.
Unruly places : lost spaces, secret cities, and other inscrutable geographies / Alastair Bonnett.

pages cm

ISBN
978-0-544-10157-9 (hardback)

1. Geography—Miscellanea. I. Title.

G
131.
B
66 2014

910—dc23

2013050983

 

e
ISBN
978-0-544-10160-9
v1.0714

 

 

 

 

For Helen and Paul

 

Our fascination with remarkable places is as old as geography. Eratosthenes’s
Geographika
, written around 200
B.C.
, offers a tour of numerous “famous” cities and “great” rivers, while the seventeen volumes of Strabo’s
Geography
, written in the first years of the first century
A.D.
for Roman imperial administrators, provides an exhaustive compendium of journeys, cities, and destinations. My favorite of Strabo’s places are the gold mines of India, which, he tells us, are dug by ants “no smaller than foxes” that possess pelts “like those of leopards.” Although our appetite for curious tales from afar has been continuous, today our need for geographical reenchantment is of a different order.

I root my love of place in Epping. It’s one of many commuter towns near London, pleasant enough but generic and placeless. It’s where I was born and grew up. As I used to rattle out to Epping on the Central Line or drive there along London’s orbital motorway, I often felt as if I were traveling from nowhere to nowhere. Moving through landscapes that once meant something, perhaps an awful lot, but have been reduced to spaces of transit where everything is temporary and everyone is just passing through, gave me a sense of unease and a hunger for places that matter.

You don’t have to walk far into our coagulated roadscape to realize that, over the past one hundred years or so and across the world, we have become much better at destroying places than building them. The titles of a clutch of recent books, such as Paul Kingsnorth’s
Real England
, Marc Augé’s
Non-Places
, and James Kunstler’s
The Geography of Nowhere
, indicate an emergent anxiety. These authors are tapping into a widespread feeling that the replacement of unique and distinct places by generic blandscapes is severing us from something important. One of the world’s most eminent thinkers on place, Edward Casey, a professor of philosophy at Stony Brook University, argues that “the encroachment of an indifferent sameness-of-place on a global scale” is eating away at our sense of self and “makes the human subject long for a diversity of places.” Casey casts a skeptical eye over the intellectual drift away from thinking about place. In ancient and medieval thought place was often center stage, the ground and context for everything else. Aristotle thought place should “take precedence of all other things” because place gives order to the world. Casey tells us that Aristotle claimed that place “gives bountiful aegis—active protective support—to what it locates.” But the universalist pretensions of first, monotheistic religion, and then the Enlightenment, conspired to represent place as parochial, as a prosaic footnote when compared to their grand but abstract visions of global oneness. Most modern intellectuals and scientists have hardly any interest in place, for they consider their theories to be applicable everywhere. Place was demoted and displaced, a process that was helped on its way by the rise of its slightly pompous and suitably abstract geographical rival, the idea of “space.” Space sounds modern in a way place doesn’t: it evokes mobility and the absence of restrictions; it promises empty landscapes filled with promise. When confronted with the filled-in busyness and oddity of place, the reaction of modern societies has been to straighten and rationalize, to prioritize connections and erase obstacles, to overcome place with space.

In his philosophical history
The Fate of Place
Casey charts a growing “disdain for the genus loci: indifference to the specialness of place.” We all live with the results. Most of us can see them outside the window. In a hypermobile world, a love of place can easily be cast as passé, even reactionary. When human fulfillment is measured out in air miles and when even geographers subscribe to the idea, as expressed by Professor William J. Mitchell of MIT, that “communities increasingly find their common ground in cyberspace rather than
terra firma
,” wanting to think about place can seem a little perverse. Yet placelessness is neither intellectually nor emotionally satisfying. Sir Thomas More’s Greek neologism
utopia
may translate as “no place,” but a placeless world is a dystopian prospect.

Place is a protean and fundamental aspect of what it is to be human. We are a place-making and place-loving species. The renowned evolutionary biologist Edward O. Wilson talks about the innate and biologically necessary human love of living things as “biophilia.” He suggests that biophilia both connects us together as a species and bonds us to the rest of nature. I would argue that there is an unjustly ignored and equally important geographical equivalent, “topophilia,” or love of place. The word was coined by the Chinese-American geographer Yi-Fu Tuan about the same time as Wilson introduced biophilia, and its pursuit is at the heart of this book.

There is another theme that threads its way throughout the places corralled here—the need to escape. This urge is more widespread today than at any point in the past: since fantastic vacation destinations and lifestyles are constantly dangled before us, it’s no surprise so many feel dissatisfied with their daily routine. The rise of placelessness, on top of the sense that the whole planet is now minutely known and surveilled, has given this dissatisfaction a radical edge, creating an appetite to find places that are off the map and that are somehow secret, or at least have the power to surprise us.

When describing the village of Ishmael’s native ally and friend, Queequeg, in
Moby-Dick
, Herman Melville wrote, “It is not down in any map; true places never are.” It’s an odd thing to say, but I think it makes immediate, instinctual sense. It touches on a suspicion that lies just beneath the rational surface of civilization. When the world has been fully codified and collated, when ambivalences and ambiguities have been so sponged away that we know exactly and objectively where everything is and what it is called, a sense of loss arises. The claim to completeness causes us to mourn the possibility of exploration and muse endlessly on the hope of novelty and escape. It is within this context that the unnamed and discarded places—both far away and those that we pass by every day—take on a romantic aura. In a fully discovered world exploration does not stop; it just has to be reinvented.

In the early 1990s I got involved with one of the more outré forms of this reinvention, known as psychogeography. Most of the time this involved either drifting in search of what some of my comrades fondly imagined were occult energies or purposely getting lost by using a map of one place to navigate oneself around another. To wander through a day care center in Newcastle while clutching a map of the Berlin subway is genuinely disorienting. In so doing, we thought we were terribly bold, but in hindsight what strikes me about the yearning to radically rediscover the landscape around us is just how ordinary it is. The need for reenchantment is something we all share.

Other books

Reluctant Protector by Nana Malone
The Counterfeit Betrothal by April Kihlstrom
The Source of Magic by Piers Anthony
Dirge by Alan Dean Foster
Charmed (Second Sight) by Hunter, Hazel
Early Dawn by Catherine Anderson
Polio Wars by Rogers, Naomi
The Evil Eye by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley


readsbookonline.com Copyright 2016 - 2024