The Mammoth Book of Killers at Large (71 page)

Amanda Thethe was not the only women Sithole had a relationship with before he killed her. Dan Mokwena, a work colleague of 19-year-old Elizabeth Mathetsa, had been sitting outside their workplace with her in early 1995 when a man walked up. Elizabeth introduced him as her boyfriend “Sello”. Dan Mokwena said that he saw Sello again a week before Elizabeth Mathetsa went missing on 25 May 1995. She was found dead in Rosslyn on 16 June. In court Dan identified the man he knew as “Sello” as the prisoner in the dock, Moses Sithole.

The aliases continued to multiply. Mary Mogotlhoa knew Sithole as “Charles”. They had had a brief relationship shortly before his arrest. It lasted only two weeks, but he had given her a watch, which Tryphina Mogotsi’s mother identified as her daughter’s. Mary Mogotlhoa also said that, after they had broken up, Sithole had gone to the police, told them that she had stolen 500 Rand (£35) and accused her of raping him.

Otherwise he repeatedly used the offer of a job as a bait. In March 1995, Wilhelmina Ramphisa met a man calling himself “David Ngobeni” who offered her a job. She completed in an application form he gave her, but he failed to turn up to their next appointment. Months later, she saw her potential employer again on the TV news. It was Moses Sithole and she had had a lucky escape.

A lorry driver named Piet Tsotsetsi testified that he received a number of calls on the phone in his lorry from women about jobs they said he had offered them. He was completely mystified by this. However, at the time, Sithole was working at the same company washing the vehicles. After he was arrested, the calls stopped. Elsie Masango’s sister testified that a man calling himself “Piet Tsotsetsi” had offered Elsie a job shortly before she disappeared.

Other witnesses testified, many of them parents who had to identify their raped and tormented daughters. No matter how harrowing the testimony, Sithole sat and smiled.

The only time he cried was when his wife Martha entered the court to testify against him with their one-year-old daughter Bridget asleep in her arms, but afterwards refused to let him see the child. This sudden upsurge of tears allowed those whose testimony he had sat through with a look of mild amusement on his face to laugh at him.

There was a brief respite when, on 12 November, the trial was suspended after Sithole had fallen down and re-opened his leg wound. When he returned from hospital, the grandmother of Monica Vilakazi testified that a man identifying himself as Moses Sithole had phoned her home on 11 September 1995, the day before her granddaughter went missing. He said they had met the previous month and had now found Monica a job in Germiston. The following day she left her grandmother’s house to become one of the women found at the Van Dyk Mine. Three days after Monica went missing, there was another phone call. This time the caller said his name was Jabulane, but Monica’s grandmother recognized his voice as Sithole’s. Before Monica’s funeral, the man phoned again this time identifying himself as “Mandla”. Sithole was in custody at the time and Mandla insisted that he would be acquitted. And he taunted the old woman, saying that Monica got what she deserved.

The curious thing here was that “Mandla” was the name of one of the men David Selepe had claimed as an accomplice. This name had not been mentioned in the newspapers at that time. Perhaps the police had not interrogated the right “Mandla” after David Selepe’s death.

Peter Magubane, the photographer from
The Star
who had accompanied Sithole and the two street kids to Kids’ Haven, said that he had introduced himself as “Patrick” – his brother’s name. It was there Sithole met Tryphina Mogotsi.

Voice identification specialist Dr Leendert Jansen was called as an expert witness to identify the voice on the recordings the police had made of the telephone conversations between
Star
reporter Tamsen de Beer and “Joseph Magwena”.

“I have no doubt that the unknown voice is in reality the voice of Moses Sithole,” he said. American voice analysis expert Loni Smrkovski was flown to South Africa to confirm Dr Jansen’s findings.

Then Inspector Mulovhedzi testified about Sithole’s arrest. According to Mulovhedzi, he identified himself as a police officer and told Sithole to stop. He then fired two warning shots. Then, Mulovhedzi said, Sithole came at him with an axe.

“He turned back and had an object in his hand and came towards me,” he said. “My life was in danger and I fired a shot at his legs . . . He kept on fighting. He hit me on my right hand and I fired some more shots. He fell to the ground.”

During cross-examination Eben Jordaan suggested that there was no axe. Sithole had merely bumped into the officer and, when he turned to say sorry, Mulovhedzi drew his gun and started shooting.

As the trial went on, the police continued to solicit the public’s help to identify eight more of the victims. Then on 3 December, in the sixth week of the trial, the prosecution introduced surprise new evidence. It was a video made in Boksburg Prison not long after Sithole’s arrest, showing him speaking about the women he had murdered.

It had been made fellow inmates Jacques Rogge and Mark Halligan and masterminded by Charles Schoeman. They were ex-police officers who had been jailed for a three million Rand (£210,000) diamond heist in Amanzimtoti, KwaZulu-Natal in 1995, during which they had killed an accomplice. Rogge suffered from diabetes and slept in the prison infirmary where he met Sithole, who wanted Rogge to steal some pills so that he could commit suicide. But first Rogge, Halligan and Schoeman persuaded him to tell his story on camera, on video equipment that the ex-cops got smuggled in. They even drew a contract giving each one a share in the profits – Sithole’s would to go to his daughter when he was dead.

The use of such evidence was contentious. It was illegal to make unauthorized recordings or videos in prison. It was also illegal to publish a prisoner’s story without the written permission of the Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, so it was unlikely that they could have made any financial gain. Indeed Charles Schoeman and his cohorts faced possible criminal charges. Then there was the vexed question of how the ex-cops got hold of the video equipment in the first place. When the video had first come to light, the Department of Correctional Services wanted to conduct an internal investigation, but the deputy attorney-general asked them to hold off so that she could keep the existence of the video secret until the trial.

This brought up all sorts of legal issues and the trial had to be suspended once again. When the proceedings resumed on 29 January 1997, Winnie Madikizela-Mandela, former-wife of President Mandela, was present. Sithole smiled at her; she did not smile back.

The video showed Sithole sitting back, smoking or casually eating an apple. He began with the first murder. In July 1995, he said, a woman he killed had shouted at him when he asked for directions. But he had turned on his not inconsiderable charm and arranged to meet her for a date. Then he had strangled her.

“I cannot remember her name,” he said. “I killed her and left her there. I went straight home and had a shower.”

He then relayed in detail how he had killed 29 women.

“I don’t know where the other nine come from,” he said. “If there was blood or injuries, they weren’t my women.”

He did not like blood and he did not want to see the faces of his victims as he took their lives. Consequently, he strangled his victims from behind, he said. However, he was obviously not so fastidious when he led his fresh victims into a field of rotting corpses.

He said that all his victims had reminded him of Buyiswa Swakamisa, the woman he claimed had “falsely” accused him of rape in 1989. He also said that he had not raped any of his victims, but that some had offered to have sex with him to save their lives. He had the opportunity to attack other women but did not do so because they were “sincere and without pretensions”.

On the video, Schoeman asked Sithole if there was one victim that stuck out in his mind. Sithole said he particularly remembered Amelia Rapodile, one of the ten women found at the Van Dyk Mine. Training in karate, she put up fierce resistance.

“She started to fight,” he said. “I gave her a chance to fight and I tell her, if you lose, you die . . . She was using her feet and kicked me. Then she tried to grab my clothes, but she could not grab me. I just tell her bye-bye.”

Charles Schoeman said he did not want to testify, claiming that his life had been threatened. But after being promised indemnity for the making of the video and any charges surrounding it, he took the stand. He said that they had originally made audio recordings of Sithole’s story, but he was so disturbed by what he had heard he had contacted the police. Then Captain Leon Nel of the East Rand Murder and Robbery Unit provided video equipment which was smuggled into prison by Schoeman’s wife. But as there had been police involvement and Sithole had not been cautioned or told that the tapes might be used at his trial, his attorney objected to their use.

DNA evidence took days as it was new to South African courts and the techniques used had to be explained in detail. However, as many of the corpses were in an advanced state of decay when they were found, DNA evidence only linked Sithole to some of the victims.

There was another trial-within-a-trial over the confession Sit-hole made in the Military Hospital after his arrest. Sithole claimed he had been coached, coerced and denied legal representation. He also claimed that the crime scenes had been shown to him by the police, rather than the other way round. On 29 July, the judge admitted confessions made in the Military Hospital and the video tape into evidence. Finally, on 15 August, the prosecution rested.

Sithole took the stand in his own defence. He claimed that he was totally innocent of all charges. Everything he had said in his confession had been fed to him by the police. He admitted knowing one of the rape victims, Lindiwe Nkosi, as she was the sister of his girlfriend, but he denied raping her. He also protested his innocence of the rape he had been sent to prison for in 1989. But Sithole did not stand up well under cross-examination and
The Star
said his testimony was “rambling, often incoherent”.

Finally, on 4 December 1997, Moses Sithole was found guilty on all 38 counts of murder, 40 counts of rape and six counts of robbery. One of the two assessors felt that Sithole should not be held accountable, but he was overruled by the judge and the other assessor. It took three hours to read the judgment. The following day, Judge David Curlewis sentenced Sithole to 2,410 years in prison. He was given 50 years for each of the murders, 12 years for each rape and five years for each count of robbery. These sentences would run consecutively, so that there would be no possibility of parole for at least 930 years. The judge said that he would have no qualms about imposing a sentence of death if it had been available and he refused to give life sentences as that would have meant Sithole could have been eligible for parole in 25 years and he had no faith in the parole boards or prison authorities to keep him in jail after that.

“Nothing can be said in favour of Sithole,” said Justice Curlewis. “In this case I do not take leniency into account. What Sithole did was horrible . . . I want to make it clear I mean that Moses Sithole should stay in jail for the rest of his life.”

Sithole listened to the sentence without emotion. He was taken to C-Max, the maximum security section of Pretoria Central Prison and the highest security cellblock in South Africa which each prisoner is allowed one hour a day outside his cell and three visits a month. One of the other 93 prisoners there is Eugene de Kock of the apartheid government’s Counterinsurgency Unit, who was sentenced to 212 years for crimes against humanity.

Sithole has AIDS but, in prison, he has access to excellent medical care and his life expectancy is now longer than if he had remained outside.

The problem here is that there were more murders than Moses Sithole and David Selepe can account for. Sithole, in his video account, which there is no reason to doubt, denied nine of the murders he was charged with, and Selepe, presumably, was innocent of the four murders that Sithole was jailed for. And the police have never been able to link Sithole to Selepe, even though there is a strange overlap between the two cases.

There is the odd coincidence around Amanda Thethe. If the police are to be believed, David Selepe had taken them to her murder site and was revealing fresh details about the crime when he was shot. But it is undoubtedly true that Sithole knew Amanda. One or other of them used her cash card and Sithole was linked to her by DNA evidence.

A man phoned murder victim Dorah Mokoena’s employer three days after she went missing, giving his name as “Martin”. Although Sithole regularly used the alias Martin, he was not charged with Dorah Mokoena’s murder.

Five days after Joyce Mashabela disappeared on 9 August 1994, a man phoned her employer, giving his name as “Moses Sima” and saying that he had found her identity papers. DNA linked Sithole to her body and he was charged with her murder. But Peggy Bodile’s body was found in the same patch of veldt two months later. Sithole was not charged with her murder. It was attributed to Selepe. Then there is the name “Mandla”, fingered by Selepe an accomplice but also used by Sithole the third time he called Monica Vilakazi’s grandmother.

The police have never revealed whether any of the four murders initially attributed to Selepe which Sithole was charged with were among the six “positively” linked to David Selepe. FBI profiler Robert Ressler and Micki Pistorius concluded that the evidence indicated that Selepe had been involved in the Cleveland murders in some way; that it was likely that the Atteridgeville killer was working with an accomplice; and that it was possible that Selepe and the Atteridgeville killer may have known each other and may even have worked together. But if Selepe was telling the truth about “Mandla”, why would he have lied about “Tito”? He may well be responsible for the murders not attributed to either Selepe and Sithole. And he is still at large.

While the trial of Moses Sithole was still underway, another serial killer was on the loose three hundred miles to the south in Transkei. Local people blame a
Mamlambo
– a legendary creature that is “half horse, half fish” from Xhosa tribal myth that inhabits the Mzintlava River near Mount Ayliff in the Eastern Cape. The creature is said to be 67 feet long, with short stumpy legs, a crocodilian body and the head and neck of a snake with a hypnotic gaze that shines at night with a green light. It drags human and animal victims in the water, drowning them, and sucking their blood and brains out. According to Xhosa tribal legend, Mamlambo brings great wealth to anyone brave enough to capture it.