Authors: David Suchet,Geoffrey Wansell
Tags: #Biography & Autobiography, #Entertainment & Performing Arts
Belgian. Indeed, one of the nicest things that
happened while I was filming in Austria was
that the four two-hour Poirots that we had
made
finally
emerged
on
American
television, starting with The ABC Murders on
19 November 1992. The New York Times’s
John J. O’Connor was particularly kind,
noting that the Poirot series started
immediately after my appearance in The
Secret Agent on the same channel in the
United States, and thereby gave the
audience ‘another opportunity to savour a
gifted actor’s versatility’.
‘Mr Suchet’s Poirot’, he went on, ‘is now a
paragon of charming ego and unquestionable
shrewdness . . . “Poirot” just keeps getting
better. Much like Mr Suchet.’ Mr O’Connor set
the tone for most of the American reviews,
which were almost all equally flattering.
What those critics did not know, however,
was that I had no idea whether I was ever to
get the opportunity to make my Poirot any
better.
The Americans liked the series so much
that they even granted the show the
accolade of a cartoon in the New Yorker
magazine, with the title ‘Hercule Parrot’. It
featured a parrot with a Poirot-like
moustache saying, ‘A cracker, s’il vous plait.’
I wondered what Dame Agatha would have
made of it.
It was in early December 1992, when I
was sitting in my hotel room in Vienna
during the filming of Lucona, that the first
indication of what the future might hold for
me came in a telephone call from my agent
in England at the time, Aude Powell – and it
had nothing whatever to do with Poirot.
Aude rang me to say that the playwright
Harold Pinter was very interested in casting
me in a new play by the American playwright
David Mamet, called Oleanna, which he was
going to direct.
‘Harold would like you to read the script as
soon as you can,’ she said.
At that moment I knew nothing about the
play, but I did know that no actor could
refuse an opportunity to work with probably
the most gifted English playwright of the
second half of the twentieth century on a
play written by one of the great talents of
the American theatre in the same period.
Oleanna
represented
a
tremendously
exciting opportunity, and I did not intend to
let it slip away without exploring it carefully.
I read the play within a week and realised
that mine was a wonderful role. I could not
wait to tell Harold that I would love to play
it. I was to play the college lecturer John in
Mamet’s ferocious examination of sexual
harassment and exploitation in American
universities. My character is accused by
Carol, a female student, of attempted rape,
abuse of power and ‘classism’, and his career
is destroyed by the allegations.
The play had only been performed once
before, in the United States, when Mamet
had directed his wife, Rebecca Pidgeon, as
Carol and William H. Macy as John. It had
provoked an enormous response, not to say
a controversy, with Newsweek magazine’s
famous theatre critic Jack Kroll describing it
by saying, ‘Mamet has sent a riveting report
from the war zone between the genders and
the classes, a war that will cause great
havoc before it can create a new human
order.’
The so-called ‘Butcher of Broadway’, the
New York Times theatre critic Frank Rich,
had enthused, ‘John and Carol go to it with
hand-to-hand combat that amounts to a
primal struggle for power’ with ‘highly
distilled dialogue unencumbered by literary
frills or phony theatrical devices’. Mamet
himself had asked Pinter to direct the play in
London.
I was fascinated. It was a unique
opportunity to appear in what could become
one of the great new plays of the last
quarter of the century, a work that had never
been performed anywhere other than New
York, and offered me the chance to return to
the theatre in a part that would utterly
confound the expectations of the television
audience that had grown used to me in
Poirot. Ironically, Harold’s interest came just
as the fifth series of Agatha Christie’s Poirot
started on ITV on Sunday, 17 January 1993,
with The Adventure of the Egyptian Tomb. It
was to air every Sunday until the first week
of March, and was just as well-received as its
predecessors had been. The audience clearly
did not share my own slight sense of
disappointment, one which Sheila, however,
did share.
Still there was no word from London
Weekend about what they intended for the
future of Poirot, while now there was the
tantalising prospect of Oleanna. I was torn in
two directions, and did not know what to do,
but a week or two after the original call from
my agent Aude, and after I had finished the
script, I got another telephone call from her.
‘I’m terribly sorry to tell you, David,’ she
said, ‘but Harold has decided to go in
another direction for the part of John.’
My stomach did a somersault and my
heart sank because this was a role that I
desperately wanted to play.
‘Please tell Harold that I quite understand,’
I said to Aude, trying to conceal exactly how
upset I was, ‘but would you ask him if he
would be prepared to have coffee with me,
just to discuss his decision?’
Aude said she would, and came back later
that day to say that Harold would be more
than happy to see me.
So, in the early days of February, I found
myself in Harold’s office in his house in
Camden Hill Square in Kensington, London.
He was utterly charming. We talked about
The Lucona Affair, and what else I was
thinking of doing. In fact, we talked for
almost half an hour before the subject of
Oleanna came up.
What I did not realise was that Harold was
using our conversation to audition me.
‘Now look here,’ he said finally. ‘You are
sitting here in front of me because – in
essence – you require me to tell you why I
am going another way in the casting of this
role.’
He paused for what seemed like a very
long time, while I kept absolutely silent.
‘But you know, I have to admit something
to you.’
There was another Pinteresque pause.
‘I have been completely wrong, and I don’t
know whether you will take this as a
compliment or not, but I think you are
perfect casting.’
My jaw dropped, and I struggled to know
what to say. Finally, I thanked him profusely
for the compliment, but then confessed, ‘But,
Harold, I don’t know whether or not I’m
going to be offered another series of Poirot,
though there is a time limit on London
Weekend making an offer, which is very,
very imminent.’
‘Well, there you are, and there it is,’ he
said in his quiet, firm voice. ‘It is for you to
decide. It is yours if you want it, but I have
to know very soon.’ Rehearsals were due to
begin in just a few weeks.
As I left his house, I realised that I had
never been in a situation quite like this in my
life before.
All I could think about was what London
Weekend was going to do about Poirot, and
exactly when the time limit on them having
to make an offer to me ran out. I did not
want to let them down, and would stand by
our agreement to play him again if they
wanted me to, even if that meant me turning
my back on Oleanna, but I was still torn.
As it happened, Sheila and I had decided
to go for a week’s break to my parents’
serviced flat in the Imperial Hotel in
Torquay. There was no point in altering our
plans. I simply asked my agent to re-check
the date by which an offer for Poirot had to
be made, and off we went.
The day of the deadline came, and I heard
nothing at all. To me, that meant that I was
now free of the obligation.
The next morning, I telephoned Aude and
told her to ring Harold and accept the offer
to play John. It was the first time ever in my
five years with the little Belgian that I knew
that I could be saying goodbye to him,
perhaps for a year, perhaps forever.
As a courtesy, I also asked Aude to
telephone
Nick
Elliott,
the
executive
producer of the Poirot series since it began,
to tell him my decision. Within minutes,
Aude rang me back to say that Nick was
desperate to speak to me.
A few moments later, Nick rang. He was
as upset as I was. ‘But you knew we were
going to offer you another series,’ he said,
his voice all but breaking.
‘But I didn’t, Nick,’ I told him. ‘The
deadline passed, and we’d heard nothing.’
‘But we are. We want to shoot again this
summer.’
I felt absolutely terrible. They had given
me this wonderful opportunity to play the
role of Poirot and here I was, letting them
down.
‘I hadn’t heard, Nick. I thought nothing
was going to happen, and so I said yes to
Harold and Oleanna.’
‘Can’t you get out of it?’
‘No,’ I told him sadly. ‘I don’t want to go
back to Harold, and besides, I really want to
play in the theatre again. I haven’t been on
the stage since Timon of Athens in 1990, and
this is a truly wonderful part.’
Nick was very upset, and I felt absolutely
dreadful. I apologised profusely, but I also
knew in my heart that I wanted to do this
play. It fulfilled my ambition to go back to
the theatre and I knew I would be mad to
turn it down. In the end, LWT postponed the
new series for a year and waited for me, but
I had no idea they would do that at the time.
In fact, I wondered if I had lost Poirot
altogether.
How an actor’s life can change, I thought
to myself, as I explained what had happened
to Sheila. If I hadn’t asked Aude to call
Harold and see if I could have coffee with
him in the wake of his decision ‘to go in
another direction’, none of this would ever
have happened.
Actors leap off into the unknown in their
careers, without really ever knowing where
their decisions are going to take them. It has
always been my view that we, as human
beings, go through our lives like spiders
spinning our threads behind us, but only by
looking backwards do we see how the past
affects the present, and how those threads
of our lives fit together.
What I certainly did not know then was
that if I hadn’t made the decision to say
goodbye to Poirot at that moment, I would
never have had the career in the theatre
that I have been lucky enough to enjoy since
then. Just as importantly, however, it also
did not mean that it was the end for the little
Belgian and me.
Chapter 11
‘A VERY LONG WAY
INDEED FROM POIROT’
Harold Pinter’s rehearsals for Oleanna
started just a few weeks after my
decision to leave Poirot altogether, for a year
at least, and they were particularly intense.
As there were just two members of the cast,
the talented young Lia Williams and me,
there was nowhere to hide as Harold,
looking as serious as ever in his habitual
black sweater and thick glasses, took us
through the battleground of the sexes that
David Mamet had constructed in three
lacerating acts.
These were some of the most difficult
weeks I had ever spent in a rehearsal room,
because the play is so consuming, so brutal
about the true nature of the relationships
between men and women, and so filled with
poison that it was all but impossible to keep
those emotions from spilling over into my
own life. Sheila and the children had got
used to the rather benign figure of Poirot