Authors: Simon Pegg
Tags: #Non-Fiction, #Adult, #Biography, #Autobiography, #Memoir, #Humor
Owning a piece of spoken entertainment and then listening to it at will seemed awfully novel at the time. Today, comedians define their entire careers by making themselves available to watch at home and comedy DVDs are everywhere. Back then, only a select number of highly regarded and established comics were able to commit their musings to vinyl. Another audio comic delight I recall enjoying at this time was the more musical styling of the Bonzo Dog Doo Dah Band. Both Cosby and the Doo Dahs were a little sophisticated for a five-year-old, but I distinctly remember enjoying Cosby’s vocal gymnastics and crazy characterisations and the silliness of Bonzo songs such as ‘Mr Slater’s Parrot’ and ‘Jollity Farm’.
I would often sit in the corner of the room wearing Dad’s massive headphones, carefully replaying the records time after time. It was something I did frequently throughout my childhood with music, comedy and film, inspiring my own creative imagination, the headphones rendering the experience intensely personal, as though it were all happening inside my own head.
One of the first long-playing records I ever owned was a Wombles album, called
Keep On Wombling
.
The Wombles
was a hugely popular, animated children’s TV series, about a family of diminutive creatures living on Wimbledon Common in south-west London, ‘making good use of the things that [they] find, things that the everyday folks leave behind’. It was essentially a show about recycling, thirty years before it became fashionable. It became so popular that Merton council, which presides over the borough of Wimbledon, had to deal with a sharp increase in littering, after children desperate to catch a glimpse of these little eco-warriors began wilfully discarding rubbish across the common.
The theme tune became a hit and composer Mike Batt went on to produce further singles and albums under the guise of the Wombles, one of which marked my first foray into studious vinyl appreciation. Side one of
Keep On Wombling
was a sort of concept album, which gave way to more generic fare on side two, a bit like
Sgt. Pepper
. Everything on side one fell under the banner of ‘Orinoco’s Dream (Fantasies of a sleeping Womble)’ and encompassed the most popular Womble’s dreams of being an astronaut, a cowboy, a jungle explorer, etc.
I spent many hours in my nan’s front parlour (one of those silent front rooms, seldom entered) listening to this album and imagining I was Orinoco living out these diverse fantasies. Predictably, my favourite track was ‘Womble of the Universe’, in which Orinoco travels into space in a clockwork rocket ship with only Madame Cholet’s cucumber sandwiches for sustenance. Space travel appealed to my imagination even before
Star Wars
arrived, and the possibility and potential contained in the dark void that surrounded us always filled me with enormous excitement.
My vinyl collection eventually grew to include two films, which I would listen to repeatedly, happy in my headphone cocoon. The first was Mel Brooks’s
Young Frankenstein
, whose purchase coincided with my mum marrying Richard Pegg.
When Mum married Richard, not only did he take on a ready-made family in Mum and me but I took on new grandparents, John and Pam, who I loved very much, and also a new uncle called Greg. Greg was a something of an AV enthusiast, and around Christmas time, the Peggs would gather to view 16mm movie prints, chosen and projected by Uncle Greg. It was always incredibly exciting, not just because it felt like we had a cinema in our house but because we never knew what we were going to watch.
At the time, the notion of home cinema was an absolute luxury; prints were expensive and complicated to screen, and the appeal was rather specialist. This made it all the more thrilling as our annual movie nights approached and speculation would mount as to what film it would be, information Uncle Greg proudly held back until the last moment.
When home video erupted in the early eighties, Uncle Greg’s film nights evaporated somewhat. It’s odd that I can go into a Blockbuster or increasingly visit a
LEGAL
download facility on the Internet and stare blankly at the endless choice, only to give up in the face of so many options. I never felt disappointment when Uncle Greg announced the title of that year’s film, only intrigued and excited. Invariably, I hadn’t heard of the film anyway. Lovingly projected on to the kind of screen used to look at holiday snaps, were Richard Lester’s
Royal Flash
(1975),
Sky Riders
, a James Coburn, Robert Culp hang-gliding actioneer from 1976, and Mel Brooks’s
Young Frankenstein
(1974). I have dim memories of enjoying the first two, but it was Mel Brooks’s loving parody of the old Universal horror films that really captured my imagination. It made me laugh, totally freaked me out and left me desperate to see it again. Fortunately for me, the film was available as an album, which my stepfather purchased from a record shop on St Aldate Street called Hickies. What is it with that street?
I listened to it again and again. Poring over every word and musical cue, replaying the film in my head. Closing my eyes I was able to clearly visualise the events of the film – Gene Wilder and Peter Boyle stomping out their hilarious version of ‘Putting on the Ritz’, or sexy Teri Garr playing the violin to lure the monster back to the castle. I must have listened to it hundreds of times.
It’s interesting that, years later, my first foray into film-making would not only be a horror/comedy but would similarly achieve its aims by employing a beloved horror staple and placing it within a comedic context. I’ll talk more about
Shaun of the Dead
later, but it occurs to me there is a correlation between my love of Brooks’s movie and the film that would mark the beginning of my big-screen career. I certainly poured real-life experiences into my contribution to the film, not least Shaun’s relationship with his stepfather. My own relationship with Richard Pegg was complex and problematic, as are the majority of step relationships. It basically boiled down to a power struggle for my mother’s affection that caused a certain amount of tension between us. We’re friends now but at the time we most certainly weren’t.
I was already six when I met him and he, at twenty-four, had no prior parenting experience. It was a learning curve for both of us and it wasn’t a particularly smooth arc. As much as I saw him as an interloper and he saw me as the physical manifestation of another relationship, when we did bond, we did so enthusiastically over films and music. We were the opposite of best friends, in that we were generally at odds, but occasionally we did enjoy bouts of welcome unity.
In the summer of 1980, he made a promise to take me to the fair that annually camped out on Gloucester city’s parkland. On the day of the proposed excursion, I visited him in Debenhams, where he worked at the time (Richard was another frustrated creative, venting his urges with the
GODS
), and he offered me the choice of either going to the fair or going to see a new film called
Raiders of the Lost Ark
. I’d seen the trailers on the tele vision, and duly noted its credentials as being ‘from the producers of
Jaws
and
Star Wars
’, and decided I’d forgo the dodgems and the waltzers in favour of another trip to the
ABC
. With hindsight, I did it as much for Richard’s sake as for my own ends. I did it because I sensed it was what he really wanted to do, and I knew if I agreed, it would not only soothe the tension between us but win me some approval. I was ten years old at the time.
Looking back, the decision I made on the third floor of the Gloucester branch of Debenhams (the back entrance of which was on St Aldate Street, opposite where our music shop used to be) was absolutely key. I didn’t realise it at the time but I was quite possibly at a metaphorical fork in the road. One path led away to easy superficial fun – all bright lights, loud noise and sugar – the other led to the movies. Now, I know
Raiders of the Lost Ark
isn’t Fellini but, crucially for me, it represented choosing substance over stimulation, mental interaction over a more fleeting sensory gratification.
My reason for doing this wasn’t a noble embracing of the humanities over the more base pleasures of the senses, it was an attempt to ingratiate myself with my stepdad; but, like
Star Wars
before it,
Raiders
served to further inspire my love of cinema and my interest in the film-making process. I have no doubt I would have seen it eventually, but something about making that specific choice resonates with me even now. Twenty-eight years later the man who made that film asked me to be in one of his films and one of the first people I shared that information with was Richard Pegg.
Have We Got a Video?
I perfected my Rick impression very quickly, widening my eyes with glee and training my top lip to pull back across my teeth in a simpering grin, sending every ‘r’ to the front of my mouth to be flattened into thin-lipped pomposity. When
The Young Ones
burst on to our screens in 1982, it was so wildly different from anything that had been on before, its effect on the country’s young was seismic. The characters were so instantly brilliant, and classrooms across the land were suddenly populated by Ricks, Vyvyans, Neils and Mikes (although mainly the first three), all competing for the honour of best impersonation. Vyvyan required you to screw your lips into a perpetual pucker, set your head abob with a subtly aggressive bounce and shout every word you said from the raspiest part of your throat, whereas Neil, often intoned by the less extrovert, required a slow, nasal drawl and use of words such as ‘wow’ and ‘heavy’. Mike seemed to be the least popular character, probably because he was an interloper from a different world: an adult scamming a student grant he was not entitled to. He was clearly the patriarch of the unit, and every self-respecting
Young Ones
fan knew dads weren’t cool.
A new wave of alternative comedy had already started with the arrival of
Not the Nine O’Clock News
, but, ‘Gob On You’ and ‘I Like Trucking’ notwithstanding, the show had always felt more like the preserve of grown-ups. The comedy was wicked, smart and often driven by a sly cynicism that somewhat sailed over the heads of the under-fifteens. The show’s contribution to the changing comedy landscape is unassailable, but its effect was far subtler than that of
The Young Ones
, which yelled and spat its way into all of our minds. I, like most, found
The Young Ones
utterly mesmerising, not just because it was so bold and daring and the characters so clearly defined they could be identified simply by their silhouettes, but because it seemed to speak directly to me. I wasn’t watching a simulation of some adult life I had no mental or spiritual connection with, I was watching something that was meant for me, and that, crucially, was specifically designed to alienate the older generation.
Every break time, and even during lessons much to the fury of teachers to whom the show was complete anathema, our school would echo with lines such as ‘Oh, have we got a video?’ and ‘Neil, Neil, orange peel, if only I could see you again.’ On lunchtime visits to John Guy’s house – he whose dining room became our break-dance rehearsal space – we would watch the one episode he had taped from the TV over and over again, to the point where I remember asking myself if I would ever tire of it, genuinely believing I would not. In truth I never did. I could watch it now and enjoy it just as much.
The Young Ones
taught me that comedy did not belong to other people, it wasn’t governed by grown-ups in rooms I was allowed to enter only if I behaved. It also taught me that the silly, childish, weird things I found funny weren’t a sign of peculiarity, alienation or a cause for alarm but that loads of other people found them funny too!
Over on Channel 4, a slightly more grown-up exercise in redefining the comedy landscape was taking place with Peter Richardson’s
The Comic Strip Presents
. . . Using many of the same faces that appeared in
The Young Ones
, producer Jeremy Issacs had, with an extraordinary amount of balls and foresight, commissioned this troupe of untested actors and comics to create a series of one-hour films that varied from genre pastiches to original and surreal flights of fancy. It amazes me that so much effort and expense was ploughed into what was essentially a hunch; a hope that this fledgling ensemble could come up with the goods. Despite being a highly inventive and hugely talented group, they were an unknown quantity in televisual terms. Their freshness and sheer force must have felt like something of a gold rush for Channel 4, a network initially committed to producing challenging and alternative television. Indeed, the Comic Strip’s
Famous Five
parody,
Five Go Mad in Dorset
, formed part of the line-up for the channel’s opening-night entertainment and this spirit certainly powered things along for some time.
One night, planted in front of the TV with my snacks and drinks, I witnessed a group of people having a lot of fun with a budget.
A Fistful of Travellers’ Cheques
was, as you might expect, a pastiche of the Sergio Leone spaghetti westerns, following the misadventures of two cowboy wannabes who find themselves living the dream in Almeria, Spain, with a number of other travelling misfits. Rik Mayall and Peter Richardson play Carlos and Miguel, the two role-playing students who drop their drawling affected accents only once, during the build-up to an apparent duel. While arguing about who should start the row that provokes their pretend gunfight, Mayall asks in timorous, plummy tones, ‘Sorry, have we started yet?’ To which Richardson replies in a thick, West Country burr, ‘Course we have, you great tosser.’ I laughed so much I wept. Fortunately I had decided to tape as much of
The Tube
as I could, determined to get some souvenir of my night alone with the TV. As soon as the show had finished, I wound it back and watched it again, making much use of the review-search option to continually replay the specific exchange between Richardson and Mayall.