Authors: Robert Dugoni
Tags: #Romance, #Mystery, #Contemporary, #Thriller, #Suspense
“The defense calls Tracy Crosswhite,” Dan said.
Tracy felt Edmund House’s gaze fix on her as she stepped through the gate and walked to the witness stand to take the oath to tell the truth. It made her sick, knowing she was House’s best chance at freedom. She thought of what Dan had told her about his conversation with George Bovine, shortly after Annabelle’s father had visited Dan’s office to warn him about Edmund House. Bovine had said that prison was the only place for someone like Edmund House. Tracy didn’t doubt it, but they were beyond that point.
Dan eased her into her testimony and Judge Meyers, perhaps sensitive to the emotional subject matter, did not rush him. After preliminary background matters had been dispensed with, Dan asked, “She was called your shadow, was she not?”
“Seemed she was always by my side.”
O’Leary strolled close to the windows. Dark tendrils of clouds reached down from an ominous sky, from which a light snow had started to fall again. “Would you describe the physical location of your bedrooms growing up?”
Clark rose. He was objecting more to Dan’s direct examination of Tracy than he’d objected during any other witness, clearly trying to disrupt the flow of Tracy’s testimony and seemingly more concerned that Dan was going to try to slip in something inadmissible. “Objection, Your Honor. It’s irrelevant.”
“It’s for foundational purposes,” Dan said.
“I’ll allow it, but let’s move this forward, Counselor.”
“Sarah’s bedroom was just down the hall from mine, but it really didn’t matter. She spent most nights in my bed. She was afraid of the dark.”
“Did you share a bathroom?”
“Yes, between our bedrooms.”
“And as sisters, did you borrow each other’s things?”
“Sometimes more than I would have liked,” Tracy said, trying to muster a smile. “Sarah and I were about the same size. We had similar tastes.”
“Did that include the same taste in jewelry?”
“Yes.”
“Detective Crosswhite, would you describe the events that took place August 21, 1993, for the court?”
Tracy felt her emotions welling and paused to gather herself. “Sarah and I were competing in the Washington State Cowboy Action Shooting Championship,” she said. “We were actually tied for the lead going into the final shooting stage, which was to shoot ten targets alternating using both hands. I missed a target, which is an automatic five-second penalty. In essence, I’d lost.”
“So Sarah won?”
“No. Sarah missed two targets.” Tracy smiled at the recollection. “Sarah hadn’t missed two targets in two years, let alone in one stage.”
“She did it on purpose.”
“Sarah knew that my boyfriend, Ben, was coming to pick me up that evening, that he planned to propose at our favorite restaurant.” Tracy paused and sipped her water, returning the glass to the table beside the chair. “I was upset because I knew Sarah had let me win. It colored my judgment.”
“In what way?”
“The weather forecast was bad. Heavy rains and thunderstorms. Ben picked me up at the competition in order to make our reservation.” Tracy felt the words sticking in her throat.
Dan helped her out. “So Sarah had to drive your truck home alone.”
“I should have insisted that she come with us. I never saw her again.”
Dan paused, as if out of respect. Quietly he asked, “Was there a prize associated with winning?”
Tracy nodded. “A silver-plated belt buckle.”
O’Leary retrieved the pewter-colored buckle from the evidence table and handed it to her, identifying it by its designated evidence number. “The medical examiner testified that she uncovered this buckle in the grave with Sarah’s remains. Can you explain how it could have got there if you’d won the buckle that day?”
“Because I gave Sarah the buckle.”
“Why did you do that?”
“Like I said, I knew that Sarah let me win. So before I left I gave the buckle to her.”
“And that’s the last time you saw it?”
She nodded. She’d never contemplated that the brief moment she’d looked back through the window of the truck cab and seen Sarah standing in the rain, wearing Tracy’s black Stetson, would be the last time she would ever see her sister. Tracy had thought about that moment often over the years, the fleeting nature of life and the unpredictability of the future even from one moment to the next. She regretted that she had been angry with Sarah that afternoon for letting her win. She’d allowed her personal pride to get the better of her, not knowing that Sarah’s intentions had been altruistic, not wanting Tracy to depart on one of the biggest nights of her life feeling bad for coming in second.
Tracy fought against it, but a tear escaped the corner of her eye. She pulled a tissue from the box on a side table and dabbed at it. Some seated in the gallery had also begun to wipe away tears and blow their noses.
Dan gave Tracy a moment to regain her composure, acting as if he was searching his notes. Back at the podium, he asked, “Detective Crosswhite, would you tell the court what your sister was wearing the last time you saw her on August 21, 1993?”
Clark rose unexpectedly and came out from behind counsel table. “Your Honor, the State objects that the question by its very nature calls for the witness to speculate and therefore would be unreliable.”
Dan met Clark before the bench. “The objection is premature, Your Honor. The State can certainly object to any particular question asked and cross-examine Detective Crosswhite concerning her recollection. That is not a valid reason to bar her testimony altogether.”
Clark sounded almost exasperated. “With all due respect to Your Honor’s ability to weed out such evidence, the State is concerned about an appellate record that includes speculation and supposition.”
“And the State is free to voice those objections to preserve the appellate record,” Dan said.
“I agree, Mr. O’Leary,” Judge Meyers said, “but we all know this case has already been played out in the media far more than I would prefer, and I appreciate the State’s concern about the record.”
Clark jumped in. “Your Honor, the State would request an opportunity to voir dire the witness to see if there is any basis, independent of what evidence has been offered during this hearing, that this witness can recall after more than twenty years the specifics of what her sister was wearing on a particular day in August, 1993.”
Meyers rocked in his chair, eyes narrowed with intrigue. Tracy was not surprised when he said, “I’ll allow the State to voir dire the witness.”
In her experience, when a judge knew it was likely that the outcome of a hearing would be headed to the Court of Appeals, he erred on being conservative in his rulings in order to limit the grounds for the appeal. By allowing Clark to examine Tracy’s recollection, he was eliminating Clark’s objection as a possible basis for the State to argue to the Court of Appeals that Meyers’s ruling had been wrong. He thus minimized the possibility of having the matter remanded back into his lap.
Dan returned to his seat beside House, who leaned over and whispered something. Whatever House said, Dan did not respond.
Clark smoothed his tie, this one adorned with trout, as he approached the podium. “Ms. Crosswhite, do you recall what you were wearing August 21, 1993?”
“I can make an educated guess.”
“A guess?” Clark glanced at Meyers.
“I was superstitious. I always wore a red bandanna, turquoise bolo tie, and my black Stetson during competitions. I also wore a long suede coat.”
“I see. Was your sister superstitious?”
“Sarah was too good to be superstitious.”
“So we can make no such
guesses
about what she might have worn that day, can we?”
“Only that she preferred to look better than everyone else.”
Smiles creased several of the faces in the gallery.
“But she didn’t have a particular shirt she wore to each competition?”
Tracy said, “She wore Scully. It’s a particular brand. She liked the embroidering.”
“How many Scully shirts did she own?”
“I’d guess ten or so.”
“Ten,” Clark said. “And no particular boots or hat?”
“She had several pairs of boots and I recall half a dozen hats.”
Clark turned toward the jury box. Realizing it was empty and that he was without a jury to play to, he positioned himself near the railing separating the gallery. “So you have no basis to testify with any certainty as to what your sister wore on August 21, 1993, other than a
guess
after twenty years, or what you may have heard during this hearing, correct?”
“No. That’s not correct.”
Clark looked taken aback. Meyers’s chair squeaked as he rocked, looking on intently. The gallery had gone silent. Clark stepped toward the witness chair, no doubt debating what was every lawyer’s dilemma on cross-examination—whether or not to ask the next question and possibly open a Pandora’s box without any idea of what was inside, or to move on to a different subject. The problem for Clark, Tracy knew from her experience as a trial witness in homicide cases, was that he had opened the subject matter, and that meant that, if
he
didn’t ask the question, Dan would. Clark’s banter slowed, cautious. “You certainly don’t remember what she was wearing.”
“No. Not with certainty, I don’t.”
“And we’ve established she didn’t have any superstitious articles of clothing she wore.”
“She did not.”
“So what other possible means . . .” Clark suddenly stopped.
Tracy did not wait for Clark to decide if he was going to finish his question. “A photograph,” she said.
Clark flinched. “But surely not of that day.”
“Yes, of that day,” Tracy said evenly. “They took a Polaroid of the three top finishers. Sarah finished second.”
Clark cleared his throat. “And you just happen to have kept this photograph for twenty years?”
“Of course I kept it. It’s the last photograph ever taken of Sarah.”
Because Tracy had removed the photograph from her rugged cart the morning she had met with Calloway to look inside her blue Ford, the photograph had never been inventoried and had never become a part of the police file.
Clark looked to Meyers. “Your Honor, the State would request a meeting of counsel in chambers.”
“Denied. Are you finished with your voir dire?”
“Your Honor, the State objects. No such photograph was ever produced in this case. This is the first we have heard anything of it.”
“Mr. O’Leary?” Meyers asked.
Dan stood. “As far as I know, Your Honor, the State is correct. The photograph certainly did not belong to the defense, and the defense had no means to produce it even if such a request had been made. However, the State clearly had access to it through Detective Crosswhite.”
“The objection is overruled,” Meyers said. “Mr. O’Leary, you may continue your examination.”
Dan re-approached the lectern. “Detective Crosswhite, do you have that photograph with you today?”
Tracy reached into her briefcase and pulled out the framed photograph. The commotion from the gallery was enough for Judge Meyers to rap his gavel. After having the photograph marked and introduced into evidence, Dan asked Tracy to describe what Sarah was wearing in it and Tracy complied. Then Dan asked, “Can you describe the earrings and necklace your sister is wearing in that photograph?”
“The earrings are jade, teardrop shaped. The necklace is a silver strand.”
“Do you recognize these?” O’Leary handed her the jade earrings Rosa had recovered from Sarah’s grave.
“Yes. They’re the same earrings Sarah is wearing in the photograph.”
Dan retrieved the miniature, Colt-shaped pistol earrings introduced at House’s original trial. The gallery stirred. “And these,” he said, identifying them by their exhibit number. “Do you recognize these earrings?”
“Yes, those were also Sarah’s.”
“Was she wearing them the day she was abducted?”
Clark bolted from his seat. “Objection, Your Honor. The witness has testified she does not recall with certainty what her sister wore that day. The only thing this witness can testify to is whether they match the earrings in the photograph.”
“I’ll withdraw the question,” Dan said. “Detective Crosswhite, are these earrings the earrings your sister is wearing in the photograph?”
“No,” Tracy said. “They’re not.”
Dan replaced the earrings on the evidence table and sat. The murmuring had reached a sufficient volume for Meyers to rap his gavel. “I’ll remind those seated in the gallery to maintain the decorum I discussed at the opening of these proceedings.”
Clark stood and approached the witness stand with a seeming sense of urgency, his voice defiant. “You testified that your sister was fashion conscious, isn’t that correct?”
“Yes, she was.”
“You said she wore any number of different ensembles to these competitions, multiple shirts and pants and hats, correct?”
“Yes.”
“Did she take additional clothes with her to these competitions and change her mind about what she was going to wear?”
“Sometimes more than once,” Tracy said. “It was an annoying habit.”
“Including changing her mind about what jewelry to wear,” Clark said.
“I can think of occasions she did that, especially if the tournament was more than one day long.”
“Thank you.” Looking partially relieved, Clark quickly sat.
Dan stood. “Briefly, Your Honor.” He crossed to the lectern. “Detective Crosswhite, the times you recall your sister changing her jewelry, do you recall a single instance in which she ever changed to the jewelry presented at Edmund House’s initial trial? The pistol-shaped earrings identified as State exhibits Thirty-Four A and Thirty-Four B?”
“I never saw her do that, no.”
Dan gestured toward Clark. “The State’s question intimates that could have been a possibility; could it have been a possibility?”
Clark objected. “Again, the question asks this witness to speculate. She can testify as to what is in the photograph.”
“The question does call for speculation, Mr. O’Leary,” Meyers said.
“If the court will indulge me, Your Honor, I believe Detective Crosswhite will explain why it does not.”