James the Brother of Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls II (141 page)

BOOK: James the Brother of Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls II
7.57Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

The same is true in Romans 10:1–14, where, playing on the issue of the ‘
uncircumcised heart
’ again, Paul now rather e
x
presses ‘
the desire of
(
his
)
own heart

for the

Salvation

of Israel
(10:1 –
sic
). In doing so, he acknowledges that the fundame
n
tal issue was ‘
being saved
’, at the same time deliberately invoking the counter-position of those in Israel whom he acknowled
g
es ‘
have zeal for God but
’, as he expresses this – taking back what he has just accorded them – ‘
not according to Knowledge
’ (10:2). Continuing this critique, he then goes on to criticize these as ‘
being ignorant of God

s Righteousness
’ – the very words with which the Cairo version of the Damascus Document begins (‘
Now listen, all
Knowers of Righteousness,
and comprehend the works of God

6
) – and in ‘
trying
to
set up their own Righteousness
,
did not submit to the Righteousness of God
’ (10:3)!

It is now a quick step to: ‘
Christ is the end of the Law for Righteousness to anyone that believes
’ in Romans 10:4. Here he again alludes to Leviticus 18:5 about ‘
doing these things and living
’ and Moses writing ‘
a Righteousness of the Law
’ (10:5). This he now counters by again using the language of the ‘
heart
’: if ‘
you believe in your heart
…,
you shall be saved, for with the heart is belief
(
leading
)
to Righteousness … and Salvation
’ (10:9–10), concluding with the completely cosmopolitan proclam
a
tion: ‘
For there is no difference between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord of all is Rich towards all who call on Him
.
For ev
e
ryone, whoever calls on the Name of God, shall be saved
(Romans 10:11–12).’
Not only does this mix both Hellenistic and Hebraic allusion, but here we again see the play on the ‘
Riches
’ and ‘
being called by Name
’ imagery in both Qumran doc
u
ments and in James. Furthermore, this language of ‘
being saved
’ reappears in both James and the
Pesher
on Habakkuk 2:4 at Qumran as well.

Colossians 3:9–11, a letter considered to be in the ‘
Pauline school
’, also reverses the language of James 3:5–10’s attack on ‘
the Tongue
’. Instructing its respondents ‘
not to Lie to one another
’ as well, it concludes: ‘
there is neither Greek nor Jew, ci
r
cumcision or uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bondman or free
’, ‘
only Christ
’. For Paul in 1 Corinthians 1:24, this is: ‘
To those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ is God

s Power and God

s Wisdom
’.
7
He also puts the same proposition in Galatians 3:28: ‘
There is not Jew or Greek, bondman or free, male or female
.
All are one in Christ Jesus
.’ As usual, this leads directly into his attack on those ‘
who wish again to be in bondage
’, scrupulously ‘
keeping days and months and times and years’,
the very elements that in the Damascus Document are so much a part of ‘
separating

in the wilderness
, ‘
setting up the Holy Things according to their precise letter
’, ‘
to love each man his brother as himself
’, and ‘
not defiling one

s Holy Spirit
’, but ‘
walking in these things in Perfect Holiness
’.
8

In 4Q
Berachot
, which punctuates its ‘
excommunications
’ and ‘
cursing’ with

amen
,
amen
’s, these are ‘
the weeks of Hol
i
ness
’, ‘
the Festivals of Glory
’, and ‘
the embroidered Splendor
of the Spirits of the Holy of Holies
’. For Paul, they are the ‘
weak and beggarly elements
’ that reduce his constituents to ‘
the bondage
(
they so
)
desire
’ (Galatians 4:9). Is it possible to conceive of anyone being more insulting than this? Also the allusion to ‘
weak
’ here not only meshes with the allusions to ‘
weakness
’ we have seen him use throughout the totality of his polemical assaults, but now it includes the point about how he ‘
labored in vain
’ regarding these matters for his Communities (4:11). This will, again, be absolutely reproduced in the language the Haba
k
kuk
Pesher
uses to condemn the ‘
vain labor
’ of ‘
the Spouter of Lying
’ which he has expended to ‘
build
(
his
)
Worthless City u
p
on Blood
and erect
(
his
)
Assembly upon Lying
’ – this paralleled too in its antithesis in CD V
II
and its analogues: ‘
erecting the fallen Tabernacle of David
’!

James and the Liar

Before proceeding to the interpretation of ‘
the Righteous shall live by his Faith
’ in Columns
VII

VIII
of the Habakkuk
Pesher
, we should look at the figurative evocation of ‘
the Tongue
’ in James 3:5–8, a chapter replete with the imagery of Qu
m
ran. Not only does it contain an allusion to the ‘
blessing and cursing
’ from Deuteronomy, which Paul also makes use of in G
a
latians 3:10, upon which most of the language of ‘
cursing
’ in these documents is based, but it even alludes to the problem of ‘
mixed liquids
’, a subject which also occupies not a little attention in
MMT
.
9
As James 3:11–12 puts this, ‘
out of the same fou
n
tain orifice pours forth sweet and bitter
’ (note here the metaphor of ‘
pouring

again
), which it compares to ‘
the death-bringing poison
’ of the Tongue, out of whose ‘
mouth goes forth the blessing and cursing
’ at the same time. It also uses the ‘
heart
’ i
m
agery we have just seen Paul use and used at Qumran with inverted effect. In James 3:13–14 this is tied, not insignificantly, to ‘
showing one

s
works
in the Meekness of Wisdom
’, followed by the words: ‘
If you have bitter jealousy and contentiousness in your heart
,
do not boast or Lie against the Truth
’.

We have just seen how important this language of ‘
Truth
’ is at Qumran, not to mention how Paul uses it in Galatians 3:1 and 4:16 to assert he ‘
does not Lie
’. Moreover it was, according to him, that by telling his communities ‘
the Truth
’, namely, that the Righteousness of the Law has been superseded by the death of Christ, he has become their ‘
Enemy
’. In James 4:8–10, this kind of language is always followed by further requests to ‘
purify your hearts
’, ‘
humble yourselves
’, and ‘
do not slander one another
’ which, just as the above, all have their direct counterparts in the literature of Qumran. As 4:11 puts this: ‘
He who speaks against
(
his
)
brother and judges his brother
,
speaks against the Law and judges the Law
.
But if you judge the Law
,
you are not a Doer of the Law
,
but a Judge
.’

These kinds of allusions are also tied in James to references to ‘
the
Diabolos
’ again (4:7) or ‘
animal
’ or ‘
beastliness
’ (3:15). But this is exactly the kind of phraseology we have already encountered in Rabbinic literature regarding the name ‘
Be

or
’ (or
be

ir
/animal, ‘
o
’ and ‘
i
’ being largely interchangeable in Qumran epigraphy) – in the Bible reckoned as the father at once of both ‘
Bela

’ and ‘
Balaam
’. We have also seen this imagery of ‘
biting
’ and ‘
swallowing
’ reflected in Paul in Galatians 5:15 and one can find it reflected in 2 Peter 2:15–16 and Jude 1:10 and 1:19, also evoking ‘
the error of Balaam
’ – referred to in 2 Peter as ‘
the Son of Be

or who loved the Reward of Unrighteousness
’ (here, of course, the ‘
Gemul
’/‘
Gemulo
’ language again). But it is the attack on ‘
Lying against the Truth
’ in James 3:14 which is most pregnant in this regard and related, not only to Paul’s claims of ‘
speaking Truth
’ in Galatians 4:16 but the imagery of ‘
the Tongue
’, by which it is introduced in James 3:5–12. Nor can there be any doubt that this genre of imagery is generically related to or parallels that of the ‘
pouring out
’ or ‘
spouting
’ i
m
agery applied to the depiction of ‘
the Lying Spouter
’ at Qumran. In turn, it is related to ‘
mouth
’ and ‘
lips
’ imagery both here and throughout the literature at Qumran.

For instance, in James 3:15–16, the language that follows this allusion to ‘
the Tongue
’ and ‘
Lying against the Truth
’ is: ‘
This is not the wisdom which comes down from above
,
but rather it is fleshly
,
animal-like
,
Demonic
,
for where jealousy and contentiousness are
,
there is confusion and every Evil Thing
.’
We have already seen the same kind of imagery in Jude and 2 Peter. In the Colossians passage recommending ‘
not Lying to one another
’, one has the same imagery of ‘
disobedience
’, ‘
a
n
ger
’, ‘
malice
’, and ‘
filthy language out of the mouth
’.

We can also see the same kind of recitations in the Community Rule in its enumeration of ‘
the Ways of the Spirit of Fals
e
hood
’, as opposed to ‘
the Crown of Glory with the Garment of Majesty in Unending Light
’ which ‘
the Sons of Truth and the Sons of Righteousness
’ will enjoy. These are the two Spirits of Light and Darkness, Truth and Lying, exactly equivalent to the ‘
Two Ways
’ in the early Church teaching document known as
The Didache
.
10
As this is put in the Nahum
Pesher
, ‘
those who lead Ephraim astray
’ – whatever this esotericism ‘
Ephraim
’ might mean (‘
Nilvim
’, a cadre of new ‘
Gentile
’ believers in the sense of being ‘
God-Fearers
’?
11
) – are specifically said ‘
to teach Lying and
,
with a Tongue full of Lies and deceitful lips
,
lead Many astray
’. This, of course, is the very opposite of the proper ‘
justifying
’ activity of both the Damascus Document and Isa
i
ah 53:11 of ‘
making Many Righteous
’, applied in the former to ‘
the Sons of Zadok
’ and, in Pauline theology, to Jesus.
12

BOOK: James the Brother of Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls II
7.57Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

Other books

Voices of the Dead by Peter Leonard
Hot Water by Erin Brockovich
Phule's Paradise by Robert Asprin (rsv)
Rumor Has It by Jill Mansell
Wild Justice by Kelley Armstrong
Chosen Sister by Ardyth DeBruyn
Fear of Falling by Catherine Lanigan


readsbookonline.com Copyright 2016 - 2024