Grid of the Gods (56 page)

the relationship between life and death."

John Michell,

The New View Over Atlantis
, p. 197.

13

S
PECULATIONS:

T
HE
P
RINCIPLES OF
A
LCHEMICAL
A
RCHITECTURE AND
E
NGINEERING

“According to an adopted theory, every ponderable atom is differentiated from a tenuous fluid, filling all space merely by spinning motion, as a whirl of water in a calm lake. By being set in movement this fluid, the ether, becomes gross matter. Its movement arrested, the primary substance reverts to its normal state. It appears, then, possible for man through harnessed energy of the medium and suitable agencies for starting and stopping ether whirls to cause matter to form and disappear.”
Nikola Tesla
¹

“In this system that I have invented it is necessary for the machine to get a grip of the earth, otherwise it cannot shake the earth. It has to have a grip on the earth so that the whole of this globe can quiver.”
Nikola Tesla
²

W
e have come a long way since the first chapter, and those early, anomalous yield returns of early hydrogen bomb testing, that suggested some aspect of the world Grid was in play. The journey has taken us from Angkor Wat and an interesting, if disconcerting, masculine-yet-androgynous imagery used to symbolize the physical medium, to Tiwanaku and Puma Punkhu in Bolivia and anachronistic displays of advanced technology, to Tikal, Chichen Itza, and Teotihuacan in Mexico, to even more disconcerting practices of human sacrifice connected to the structures, and to bizarre mythological correspondences between Mesopotamia and the Mayans regarding the engineering of mankind,
to curious musical codes in Plato, Pythagoras, and the Vedas, to the sands of the Egyptian desert where a strange megalithic structure encodes quantum mechanical and astrophysical data, to the plateau of Giza, and to yet another example of a “topological metaphor” present in Egyptian cosmology. Along the way we’ve encountered Nazis building on the grid, Nazi and Soviet physicists implying “something was wrong” with standard models, and we’ve encountered a strange topological metaphor and mythological parallels concerning the creation, or better put, the engineering of mankind and “Tower of Babel” moments of history, from to Meso- America to Mesopotamia. We have implied along the way that at least
some
of these structures — the pyramidal ones — on the world Grid system were alchemical hyper-dimensional machines. Certainly in the case of Egypt the case can be made that, at least from the
esoteric
point of view, they can be, and possibly were, viewed as such.

But can a stronger case be made that this is the case from a mathematical and scientific standpoint? Can one argue that at least
some
of these structures were more deliberately and scientifically conceived as “hyper-dimensional” machines, and, if so, what was their purpose?

Indeed such a case can be advanced, and that is the task of this final, and most technical, chapter, but before that case can be fully appreciated and understood, a reprise of the arguments of the previous chapters is now, finally, in order.

A. Summary of the Arguments and Conclusions of the Previous Chapters
1. Historical Arguments and Mythological Parallels

Our historical arguments and mythological parallels can be summarized as follows:

1) There are three overall
levels of construction
evident throughout the world in conjunction with constructed structures on the world Grid, and paradoxically, the older the structures, the higher the technological skill and scientific knowledge encoded in them is. Yet, the placement of such sites as Tikal
and Teotihuacan on a Grid system that evidently placed the prime meridian through the Great Pyramid’s apex indicates that some consistent body of knowledge survived into the later periods of construction, and that this knowledge may have been the proprietary intellectual culture of a hidden elite or elites constructing them.

2) The consistency of the building and placement of objects on the world Grid system, plus the consistency of the mythological
Leitmotifs
over time and area also suggests that a detailed plan was in place that arose from that common proprietary intellectual culture of that elite.

3) The high level of scientific knowledge represented by such sites as Giza or Nabta Playa, or for that matter, Teotihuacan, indicate a degree of scientific knowledge that could only have come down from High Antiquity from a civilization and scientific culture equally, if not more, sophisticated as our own. Additionally, some sites, such as Puma Punkhu, exhibit stone working technology equally as if not more sophisticated than our own, and thus a technological sophistication equal if not exceeding our own. It is thus reasonable to seek scientific rationalizations for the functions of these structures on the world Grid.

4) Curiously, as we also saw, the Mayan mythology parallels that of the Mesopotamian in its assertion that mankind was an engineered creature to function basically as the slave or servant of the gods. There is even present in the Mayan mythology a Tower of Babel moment in which mankind is embarked upon a project that somehow threatens the gods’ power over it, and accordingly, a
political
decision is taken to end that project, whatever it was. It is my speculation that this project was intimately connected to the pyramid building and other constructions associated with the world Grid. The consistent esoteric association of pyramidal structures with “the gods” is an indicator that such structures were associated with the knowledge — that is to say, the
science and technology
— of “the gods”, and this is particularly the case with the esoteric traditions surrounding the Giza complex, Teotihuacan, and the sites of Meo-America. Again, this
argues that scientific rationalizations for the functional purpose of such structures should at least be entertained.

5) In more modern times, the lithium-7 explanation for the anomalous yields of early hydrogen bomb testing was suggested to be a smokescreen and a deliberate lie on the part of the U.S. government, for the following reasons:

a) Lithium-7 fusion reactions were clearly known, and openly talked about, by Nazi-Argentine scientist Dr. Ronald Richter in connection with his “fusion” project for Argentine President Juan PerThis project attracted world attention, and, as I demonstrate in my book
The Nazi International
, the considerable covert attention of American military and scientific authorities, such that his explanations of lithium-7 reactions were known
months before the USA claimed it had not considered its fusion reactions when it designed and tested the Castle Bravo device.
In the historical context proffered by Richter’s project in Argentina, in other words, the post-Castle Bravo explanations seem ridiculous, for we are being asked to believe American scientists did not account in their design for a reaction that was well-known to other nuclear engineers, Nazis, Soviets, and Argentines among them!

b) Richter made it clear in his explanations both to Argentine and American authorities that he regarded a rotating and stressed plasma to be a key for tapping into the zero point energy itself, that is to say, he viewed fusion reactions within rotating and precessed plasmas as hyper- dimensional geometries gating energy into the fusion reaction itself. Similar suggestions were, as noted in chapter one, made by the Soviet astrophysicist Dr. Nikolai Kozyrev in connection to observations made about the sun itself. In short, it was suggested that the early h-bomb tests were returning anomalous yields because they tapped into geometries of the local physical medium itself, and since those geometries changed constantly, the yields of thermonuclear devices of the
same design would also change slightly depending on the time and place of the test, i.e., depending upon the geometry of space time itself, and in conjunction with the energies of the earth Grid. It consequently became a highly and deeply classified secret of an “off-the-books” physics.

c) It was also shown that, apparently, the Nazis prior to and during World War Two had at least
some
knowledge, howsoever rudimentary it may have been, of this system, since they placed their transmitters and other installations are key points along that part of the Grid that fell under their control.

6) Finally, we also noted in the case of Meso-America and South America that at some
later
point the practice of human sacrifice arises in connection with certain sites on the Grid, as
one elite is replaced by another
, thus signaling the presence of
two
elites, with different understandings of how to manipulate the world Grid. How, then, does one rationalize this practice — if it can be rationalized at all — in connection with the speculative scientific rationalizations of the functional purpose of such structures and sites? To put it as bluntly as possible, why does sacrifice arise in conjunction with the pyramids of Mexico and Meso-America, and not in conjunction with those of Egypt?

a) While this is not the book to address either this bizarre and cruel fact, nor that of the disconcerting and curious imagery of “masculine-androgyny” associated with the topological metaphors in some cultures, its presence in one place and its absence in the other does tend to suggest that one elite prevailed in one place, and the other in the other place.

b) We also saw that the logic used to justify the practice of sacrifice was curiously similar in the case of the Aztecs, and the Christian archbishop Anselm, and that in each case, that logic relied upon the idea of a debt mankind owed to the gods, a “spiritual economics” that was impossible for mankind ever to repay, a step that
effectively made “the gods” or “God” nothing but banksters.

2. The Strange Topological Metaphor

We also encountered, in conjunction with the cultures — Vedic, Mayan, and Egyptian — that have built pyramidal structures and associated them with the gods, and with their activities and knowledge, a strange mythological and cosmological parallel that we have called simply “the topological metaphor”:

7) In the Vedic, Mayan, Egyptian, and even Hermetic cosmology, all creation arises out of differentiations in a primordial “nothing” which is variously described as a primordial ocean or sea, an imagery consistently used in ancient literature to describe the fabric of space-time itself. While we saw evidence of that disconcerting “masculine-androgynous” imagery operative both in the Vedic and Mayan mythologies in conjunction with this topological metaphor, further explorations as to the reasons for its presence would require a book of its own to explore to the degree it requires. But for the present moment, viewing this primordial Nothing as undergoing a process of differentiation resulting in two regions with a common surface exhibited the rise of a “primordial triad,” the regions and common surface themselves, with the names for each of these three entities varying according to the local mythology:

a) For the Vedic, the names for these three entities within the topological metaphor were Vishnu, Brahma, and Shiva;
³

b) For the Hermetic, God, Space, and Kosmos;
⁴

c) For the Mayan, Sky, Sea, and the implied common surface between the two;
⁵
and,

d) For the Egyptian, Ptah, Sekhmet, and Nefertum.
⁶

The presence and persistence of this metaphor throughout such disparate cultures — all of them engaged in pyramid building of one sort or another — argues strongly from the cultural context that they viewed these structures in the same way as Nikola Tesla — whose words were cited in the epigrams at the beginning of this chapter — viewed his own technological quest, as the means “to get a grip on the earth” and to cause the movements of the aether to stop and start, i.e., as the machines by which to manipulate the physical medium itself.

8) The strong association of the topological metaphor of the physical medium with consciousness itself also implies that, for these ancient cultures, the pyramidal structures esoterically associated with the physical medium were also viewed as
consciousness
manipulators, or, to put it slightly differently, that these were also alchemical machines for the transformation of consciousness and social engineering itself.
⁷

3. The Types of Numerical Coding

9) In our survey in previous chapters of the pyramidal portions of the world Grid, we also encountered not only three levels of construction activity and corresponding scientific and technological sophistication, but also three distinct kinds of numerical coding involved: