China's Territorial Disputes (16 page)

December 1996,    4.    
http://snipe.ukc.ac.uk/intemational/papers.dir/deans.html

(accessed 20 January 1999).

68    
Ibid.,
9-10, n40, n41.

69    
Ibid.,
10, n42.

70    
Feng Yun Ti Nien Tai
, 317.

71    “The Woes of Wu,”
Economist,
3 November 1990, 42.

72    
Feng Yun Ti Nien Tai,
318.

73    Deans, “The Diaoyutai/Senkaku Dispute: The Unwanted Controversy,” 10, n49.

74    Editorial,
Nineties Monthly Newsmagazine
,10 October 1996, 55.

75    Dennis T. Yasumoto, “The Politicization of Japan’s ‘Post-Cold War’ Multilateral Diplomacy,” in Gerald Curtis (ed.)
Japan’s Foreign Policy After the Cold War
(Armonk NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1993), 328.

76    Liping Deng and Akiyo Mukai, “Japan’s Official Development Assistance to China: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis,”
International Politics
(formerly
Coexistence),
June

1996, no. 33,165.

77    Press conference by press secretary of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 23 September 1996.
http://www2.nttca.com:8010/infomofa/press/1996
> (accessed 20 January 1999).

78    Murakami Mutsuko, “Center of the Storm,”
Asiaweek
, 20 September 1996, 21.

79    Jun Ping, ‘Japan’s General Election and Changing Political Climate,”
Liaowang
Magazine, 1996, no. 45, 44.

80    
Ibid.,
43.

81    An excellent treatment of the Japanese party system after 1945 can be found in the book by Masaru Kohno,
Japan’s Postwar Party System
(Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997).

82    “Rocks of Contention,”
Far Eastern Economic Review
1 November 1990, 20.

83    “Seirankai: Thunder on the Ultra-Right,”
AMPO
(Japan), 1974, vol. 6, no. 2, 29.

84    Shintaro Ishihara, as quoted in “Senkaku Issue a Litmus Test for the US: Shintaro Ishihara, Writer,”
Sankei Shimbun,
5 November 1996.

85    
Kyodo News Agency,
FBIS-EAS-96-202,17 October 1996.

86    Murakami Mutsuko, “Center of the Storm,”
Asiaweek,
20 September 1996, 21.

87    “The Emperor’s Legions: A History of Japan’s Right Wing,”
AMPO
(Japan), 1989, vol. 23, no. 2, 3.

88    “Opinion: Chinese Press,”
Hong Kong Standard
,17 September 1996.

89    
Ibid.

90    In one survey of attitudes of PRC youths toward Japan, conducted at the end of

1996, the word ‘Japan” made 83.9 percent of those surveyed recall the Nanjing Massacre, and 81.3 percent of them recall Japan’s denial of its aggression against the Chinese during the Pacific War.
Zhongguo Qingnian Bao
, 18 March 1997.

91    Todd Crowell, “United in Rage,”
Asiaweek,
20 September 1996, 20.

92    Cai Jinnan, “Fishermen’s Livelihood Seriously Affected,”
Central Daily News
(Taiwan), 8 September 1996.

93    “Soong Chu-yu Oueries ‘Where is Communist China?’,”
Central Daily News
(Taiwan), 24 July 1996.

94    “Ilan Fishermen Decides to Visit Tiaoyutai to Plant National Flag and Declare Sovereignty,”
China Times
, 22 July 1996.

95    Lin Zefeng, “National Assembly Concerned: Request Naval Protection for Fishermen,”
Central Daily News
(Taiwan), 21July 1996.

96    
Ibid.

97    
Hong Kong Standard
, 2 September 1996.

98    “Japan and Taiwan Reportedly Agreed to Enact an Unofficial Fisheries Agreement,”
Central Daily News
(Taiwan), 8 August 1996.

99    “Japan’s Move on Island Protested,”
Central Daily News
(Taiwan),17 October 1996.

100    “ ‘Uniting to Protect Tiaoyutai’ Chinese Communist Stance Unclear,”
Central Daily News
(Taiwan), 24 July 1996.

101    “Tiaoyutai Dispute - Lee Teng-hui: To Be Solved Through Peaceful Foreign Foreign Relations,” and “Wu Dun-yi: Must Let Japan Feel International Pressure,”
Central Daily News
(Taiwan),13 September 1996.

102    Lin Jinjing, “Harmony Benefits Both: Tiaoyutai Sovereignty Question Should Be Temporarily Shelved,”
Central Daily News
,13 August 1996.

103    “Japan Increases Substantive Relations With Taipei,”
Central News Agency
(Taiwan), FBIS-CHI-96-245,19 December 1996.

104    Press conference by press secretary of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan on 10 September 1996.
http://www2.nttca.com:8010/infomofa/press/1996
(accessed 20 January 1999).

105    Crowell, “United in Rage,” 20.

106    Yojana Sharma, “East Asia: China Turns the Guns on Japanese Militarism,”
Inter

Press Service News Wire,
   4    September    1996.    
http://sii.standford.edu:80/~

swjar/ips0904.htm (accessed 20 January 1999).

107    “Commentary,”
People’s Daily,
21 September 1996. For more historical analysis favoring the Chinese claim to the Diaoyu Islands, see “On the Diaoyu Islands Sovereignty Dispute,”
People’s Daily
(Overseas Edition),18 October 1996.

108    Anthony Spaeth, “Nationalism Gone Awry: Death in the Diaoyus,”
Time International Magazine,
7 October 1996, vol. 148, no.15, 25.

109    Maggie Farley and Rone Tempest, ‘Japan Blocks Flotilla Claiming Islands for China,”
Los Angeles Times
,16 September 1996.
http://sii.standford.edu:80/~swjar/
lat_0924.htm (accessed 20 January 1999).

110    “Tokyo ‘Cautious’ on Recognizing Beacon,”
Hong Kong Standard,
26 September

1996.

111    Press conference by press secretary of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan on 27 September 1996.
http://www2.nttca.com:8010/infomofa/press/1996
(accessed 20 January 1999).

112    
Ibid.'

113    Charles Hutzler, “China to Japan: Back Off Claim,”
Associated Press,
30 September

1996.
http://www.arts.cuhk.hk/NanjingMassacre/nmnwe96.html
(accessed 20 January 1999).

114    Antoine So, “Chinese Urged the Government to Send Troops to Diaoyutai Isles,”
Hong Kong Standard,
2 September 1996.
http://www.arts.cuhk.hk/NanjingMassacre/
nmnwe96.html (accessed 20 January 1999).

115    John Leicester, “Activist Shipped from Beijing,”
Associated Press,
16 September 1996.
http://sii.standford.edu:80/~swjar/ap_0916a.htm
(accessed 20 January 1999).

116    Maggie Farley and Rone Tempest, ‘Japan Blocks Flotilla Claiming Islands for China,”
Los Angeles Times,
16 September 1996.

117    Patrick E. Tyler, “Shifting Gears, Beijing Reins in Anti-Japanese Campaign,”
New York Times
, 19 September 1996. See also a report on posters put up by students at Shanghai’s Fudan University attacking the Beijing authorities for being soft on Japan’s Diaoyu claim, in
China Spring
, October 1996, vol. 157, 86.

118    
China News Digest,
citing
Washington Post,
23 September 1996.

119    
Neihon Keizai Shimbun,
29 October 1996.

120    Russel Skelton, “Japan Wary as China Builds Military Might,”
International Herald Tribune
, 22 July 1996.

121    Yojana Sharma, “East Asia: China Turns the Guns on Japanese Militarism,”
Inter Press Service News Wire,
4 September 1996.
http://sii.standford.edu:80/~swjar/
ips0904.htm (accessed 20 January 1999).

122    Song Qiang, Zhang Zangzang and Qiao Bian,
China Can Say No
(Beijing: Zhonghua Gongshang Lianhe Chubanshe, 1996). For anti-Japanese diatribes, see “Ignorant Japan,” 106-121, and ‘Japan Is Joining In the Chorus of Containing China,” 177-185. For even more anti-Japanese diatribes, see Song Qiang, Zhang Zangzang, Qiao Bian, Tang Zhengyu and Gu Qingsheng,
China Can Still Say No
(Beijing: Zhonghua Gongshang Lianhe Chubanshe, 1996), “Heavenly Dynasty and the Pill,” 74-171. The authors essentially argued against a heightened role for Japan in Asia and the United Nations, and attacked the Japanese for permitting a revival of nationalistic “militarism,” because of their reluctance to formally apologize for their invasion of China and other parts of Asia during the Second World War.

123    Bian Jinfeng, “John Chang: Fishing Rights of Tiaoyutai Islands Should Be Settled First,”
Central Daily News
, 30 September 1996.

124    “Taiwan Won’t Give In on Sovereignty in Diaoyu Talks,”
Hongkong Standard,
3 October 1996.

125    “Second Round of Talks with Japan Ends 4 October,”
Chung Kuo Shi Pao
[China Times] (Taiwan), FBIS-CHI-96-194, 6 October 1996.

126    Robin Ajello, “The Flames of Nationalism: Will Diaoyu Activists Hit the Lighthouse Next?” in
Asiamek,
18 October 1996, 22.

127    Du Shengcong, “Yimian wuxingqi youkaishi rang baodiao yundong zoushang fenlie,”
Xin Xinwen [The Journalist],
19 October 1996, 22.

128    Han Nai-kuo, “US Will Not Take Sides in Tiaoyutai Dispute,”
Central News Agency
(Taiwan), 17 October 1996.

129    Shintaro Ishihara, as quoted in “Senkaku Issue a Litmus Test for the US: Shintaro Ishihara, Writer,”
Sankei Shimbun,
5 November 1996.

130 Dan Slater, “Leaving No Stone Unclaimed,”
Weekly Report on the Asia-Pacific,
5 October 1996.
[email protected]
(accessed 20 January 1999).

131    “Interviews With New Ministers: Foreign Minister Yukihiko Ikeda; Relations with China Ranks with the U.S. as an Important Relationship,”
Asahi Shimbun
, 13 November 1996.

132    Du Shengcong, “Yimian wuxingqi youkaishi rang baodiao yundong zoushang fenlie,”
Xin Xinwen [The Journalist],
19 October 1996, 23.

133    Bruce Gilley, “Controlling Interest,”
Far Eastern Economic Review,
28 September 1996, 23.

134    Masahi Ishihara, “Japan’s Receptivity to Conditional Engagement,” in James Shinn (ed.)
Weaving the Net: Conditional Engagement with China
(New York: Council of Foreign Relations Press, 1996), 185.

135    James P. Dorian, David Fridley and Kristin Tressler, “Energy and Mineral Resources,” in Mark J. Valencia (ed.)
The Russian Far East in Transition: Opportunities for Regional Economic Cooperation
(Boulder CO: Westview Press, 1995), 97.

136    
Direction of Trade Quarterly,
Japan Import Export Data for December 1973, June

1979, September 1991 and September 1997.

137    Elspeth Thomson, “Japanese EDI, Exports, and Technology Transfer to China,” in Joseph C. H. Chai, Y. Y. Kueh and Clement A. Tisdell (eds)
China and the Asia Pacific Economy
(Commack NY: Nova Science Publishers, 1997), 186.

138    
China Trade Report,
published monthly in Hong Kong by
Far Eastern Economic Review.

139    Keun-Wook Paik,
Gas and Oil in Northeast Asia: Policies, Projects and Prospects
(London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1995), 171.

140    Roger Fisher and William Ury,
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
(Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1981). Fisher and Ury give an example concerning the difficult negotiations between Egypt and Israel over where to draw a boundary in the Sinai. After years of fruitless bargaining, it was discovered that, while Egypt cared a great deal about sovereignty over the Sinai, Israel was more concerned with its security. Giving to each what it valued most in this case meant creating a demilitarized zone under the Egyptian flag. This had the effect of giving Egypt “sovereignty” and Israel “security,” to the satisfaction of both.