Authors: Philippe Auclair
Was this arrogance, stupidity, or playfulness? Or simply the urge to provide the press with the kind of copy they had been expecting from him for the last nine months, and which flattered him far more deeply than he cared to show? Cantona kept a close eye on what was said and written about him. So did the clan, back in Marseilles. As Gérard Houllier told me forcefully on several occasions, the more talented a footballer is, the more insecure he feels about his ability – and Éric didn’t lack in talent. To illustrate his point, Houllier told me of Juninho Pernambucano, Lyon’s superb midfielder, being physically sick before a number of ‘crunch’ games – in which he almost always performed superbly. Éric might have been his own man, but in this he was no different from most of the players he conversed with on the pitch. What set him apart was his strategy, how he coped with the demands he and others put on himself. He managed his own persona as it pleased him, and with such efficiency that even genuine slips into automatic, quasi-primal speech became indiscernible from calculated statements. He would provoke, attempt to wrong-foot his questioners, with an audacity that verged on the suicidal (that word, again). British reporters seldom came across this side of his character later on. The linguistic barrier might have contributed to this – but only in part, as it became another weapon in Éric’s armoury; his English was good enough, as we’ll see, despite the enduring legend of a sombre, lapidary and barely comprehensible Frenchman at odds with his adopted country’s language.
Late in September of that year, 1987, a
France Football
reporter paid a visit to Cantona at the Stade de l’Abbé-Deschamps and came back with an astonishing interview which was published on the 29th of that month. This was twelve days after Éric had missed a number of chances in Auxerre’s 2–0 defeat at Panathinaikos, which seemed to condemn Guy Roux’s team to a first-round exit from the UEFA Cup. As Éric made himself increasingly scarce with the media over the years, papers desperate for Cantona-isms cannibalized this remarkable outpouring of juvenile angst and anger as if it provided the alpha and omega of his personality. Despite Éric’s ingenuous admission that he talked a lot of bullshit’, it became an unreferenced and frequently butchered
Urtext
in the Cantona canon, which is why I have added it as a postscript to this account of Cantona’s Auxerre years, exactly as
France Football
readers discovered it in the autumn of 1987. It has never been reprinted since, and I have only excised those parts which dealt with circumstances which would lose all relevance as soon as Panathinaikos did, indeed, usher Auxerre out of the UEFA Cup. (Cantona, who had promised he would win the return leg ‘on his own’ after his poor display in the first match, was almost as good as his word: on 30 September he scored one of Auxerre’s three goals. But the Greek side hit back with two of their own, and that was that.)
This extended question-and-answer session gave a fascinating glimpse into the naïve, contradictory, but also profoundly sincere and sometimes strikingly expressed convictions of a very young man. It also shocked and divided that part of public opinion which paid attention to football enough to cut the country into two camps, whose
garrisons would entrench themselves deeper and deeper as years went by. To some, he was not so much a breath of fresh air as a tornado that swept away the hypocrisy of the
bien-pensants
, a non-conformist who could literally do no wrong, victimized by cowards and careerists. To others (the majority, to begin with), a mildly deranged, self-justifying, self-aggrandizing
voyou
who talked nonsense and could get away with it as long as he put footballs into a net. At the first sign of weakness, Cantona would be shot down by his critics. Tellingly, it was his own actions that provided them with the ammunition.
‘If I have a piece of advice to give to the young, it is to count on nobody but themselves to succeed. It gives me pleasure that ten-year-olds have my poster on their bedroom wall. But I ask those who, one day, will be contacted by professional clubs, to tear that poster up’.
That poster’ could have been a blown-up photograph taken by a man who met Éric on the very day he gave that infamous interview. Didier Fèvre – who snapped
France Football
’s cover shot – had started pointing his camera at sportspeople only six months previously. His pedigree was unusual in many respects – his father had been the favourite printer of Robert Doisneau and Henri Cartier-Bresson – and Didier himself was accustomed to rubbing shoulders with film actors and directors rather than footballers. Despite, or because of this background, he became close to a number of players whose interests extended beyond the playing field or the after-match visit to a nightclub – Dominique Rocheteau, Gerald Passi, Éric’s great friend Stéphane Paille, to name a few. But it is with Cantona that he established the most passionate of these friendships – almost a love affair in its intensity, whose sudden and unpredictable breakdown Didier has not quite got over, seventeen years later. ‘Our relationship was one of exchange, an enrichment for the both of us,’ he told me. ‘Éric was so keen to discover new things, to open himself to new experiences,’ like sitting down in Fèvre’s Parisian sitting room to watch Max Ophüls’s films –
Le Plaisir
was a favourite – and talk for hours about the great creators the photographer had met in his youth. Didier saw a side of Éric’s character that was off limits to his football acquaintances: a shy aspiring artist experimenting with mixed media, applying layers of colour to cut-outs of photographs, modest about his own talent, eager to discuss his work, and genuinely open to criticism and suggestions. The pair would spend their family holidays together, often joined by Paille and his wife. As he was drawn ever closer to the epicentre of the Cantona circle, Fèvre became party to information his workmates at
L’Équipe
would have killed for, and which he had to keep secret, putting himself in ever more delicate situations. But Éric had put his trust in him, fully, without afterthought or calculation. He valued loyalty above all other virtues, and, demanding as he was, also showed himself to be the most generous of friends – that is, until he felt, often without justification, or for reasons only he could fathom, that this trust had been abused or betrayed, two words which could pass for synonyms in his vocabulary.
As often with Cantona, a friendship would be born when he found himself confronted by someone who had the courage to question him, or willing to stand his ground when challenged by authority. That afternoon in Auxerre, in Fèvre’s case, authority took the shape of Guy Roux. ‘I didn’t know much about Cantona,’ Fèvre recalls, ‘but I’d been struck by the way he celebrated his goals, with a movement of his arm, his fist clenched, very imperious, chest upright, like a Roman Caesar. I was quite shy – I wasn’t really part of the world of football yet. Roux agreed to give me fifteen minutes with his player. I asked Canto if he wouldn’t mind doing this gesture for me. He – an actor to the core – complied and started gesticulating on his own. Guy Roux noticed it, and told me: “You’re not here to make my kids behave like clowns.” I heard myself replying: “Mr Roux, when it comes to football, I am in no position to give you any advice; but leave the photography to me.” Canto was astonished! Guy Roux too, I suppose. He wasn’t used to people talking to him like this, and he just said: “All right, all right, do your thing.” And I guess this is how Éric first noticed me, the first step he took in building up our friendship.’
A few of Didier’s pictures appear in this book, which show a man very different from the ‘Roman Caesar’ who was, again, the fulcrum of Auxerre’s side in the 1987–88 season, a year of consolidation, confirmation and eventually turmoil for the newly capped international.
Éric needed to be at his best for the
Icaunais
, who had lost a key player – his brother-in-law Bernard Ferrer – as early as 19 August. Ferrer had suffered a fractured thighbone in a home game against Laval, in which Cantona took part. Such injuries are extremely rare in football, and no one could be sure that Ferrer would ever play again. Éric and Isabelle spent half the night by Nino’s bedside. ‘Bernard brought me great confidence,’ Cantona explained to journalists who wondered why Roux’s team was making such a hash of things when it had been expected to challenge for a European place again. ‘Whether we dominated play or not, I knew that, at some stage, I’d receive a pass I could score from.’ Not any longer. With Nino out for a year, Éric had to shoulder yet more responsibility. He did so with a huge heart, played some magnificent football, showing that for all his flicks and tricks, he was no Flash Harry, but an extravagantly gifted footballer who was born with a rare sense of the collective nature of the game. Roux is still visibly moved by the memory of one of these games when the supposed egotist sacrificed himself to the team cause – a desperately needed 2–1 victory at Le Havre, on 6 October 1987.
‘What an awful day it was,’ he told me. ‘A hurricane was blowing from the sea, the rain was lashing down. In the first half, we are playing with the help of the wind, and we score [
through Éric, as it happened
]. In the second half, Cantona positions himself on the penalty spot – our penalty spot! He clears every corner kick. Each ball he gets, he gets past five players, he manages to bring us 50 metres further upfield, he gives us time to breathe . . . He did that for the whole game. I can still see him. He was so proud of himself! This game was a present from him to us.’ There was steel in the twenty-one-year-old. At a time when Auxerre, short of players and short on form, needed fighters on the pitch – five 0–0 draws in six league games from 24 October to 27 November – he was the most committed of them all. From mid-October to the New Year, every time he scored – three times – Auxerre won, and on no other occasion.
France too had its problems, and these Éric couldn’t solve on his own: the France of Henri Michel, that is, not the France of Marc Bourrier. Cantona found himself in a unique position. Still young enough to play for the
Espoirs
until the end of their two-year European campaign – should it take them to the final – he had also gained by right a place in the starting eleven of the senior squad, and featured in four of the five matches it played until February 1988 (he only missed a 1–1 draw in the Soviet Union because of a slight injury). The contrast between the elation he felt when joining the under-21s and the soul-searching that accompanied every outing of the full international side couldn’t have been starker. Michel’s players huffed and puffed from one depressing draw to another, also conceding a pitiful 0–1 home defeat to the German Democratic Republic in November, which, coming on the heels of an equally pitiful 1–1 stalemate against Norway, confirmed that the European title France had won in such exhilarating fashion in 1984 would not be defended in the final phase of the next tournament. Meanwhile Bourrier’s
Bleuets
, who dispatched Italy 2–1 in mid-March in the home leg of their European quarter-final, were a joy to watch, and a joy to be part of.
Two years later, in Montpellier, where Stéphane Paille and Cantona thought they could recapture the magic of those days, Éric would say: ‘We had a good atmosphere to start with, which became a fabulous attitude, which enabled us to overcome unbelievable situations, because we went through great moments, important successes. When you live these emotions, you give everything again the next time, so you can live them again.’ Paille felt just as strongly, and there was a great deal of emotion in his voice when we reminisced about these golden days, twenty years after the two friends had worn the blue jersey for the last time together. ‘Our friendship was born on the pitch,’ he told me, ‘when we both joined the under-21s in 1986; and we took it from there. We got on well together when we were playing, we got on well when we were not. We both came from similar clubs, smaller clubs which had a tremendous reputation in terms of producing young players . . . I wouldn’t say these academies were regimented, but it’s true that being with the
Espoirs
gave us extra freedom. We were professionals, and we didn’t abuse it.’ Here, I could feel a smile creep into Stéphane’s voice – it was obvious that many anecdotes could follow, but not at that time. We had touched on something very private, which I’m convinced was tinged with regret, pain even. He checked himself, and carried on. ‘Marc Bourrier let us get on with it. From the beginning, it was all about the joy of being together and playing together, and Bourrier did nothing to take that joy away from us.’ Could he tell me more about the nature of that joy? ‘Éric and I shared a passion for
le beau jeu, le geste
[the beautiful game, the elegant piece of skill]. We just clicked. He missed the final because of a spat with Henri Michel, but he was still one of us; his contribution had been immense.’
When Bourrier, a lovely man, had to deal with the odd act of indiscipline, he sought an explanation, not an opportunity to administer punishment; he found his exuberant, generous, hard-working boys a dream to deal with. ‘Cantona? He never gave me a problem,’ he told me from his house in the south-west of France. ‘He gave me pleasure. We trusted each other, and he didn’t disappoint me. I don’t know anything about the “difficult” side of Éric’s character.’
So, by the spring of 1988, almost everything Éric had hoped for when he was smashing cans against the walls in Les Caillols had come to pass. He had become a professional footballer. He had scored for the national team. Under the guidance of two men who appreciated him for whom and what he was, Guy Roux and Marc Bourrier, he had become the leader of a new generation at club and
Espoirs
level. All that was left for him to do was to make the step up to a bigger club, to challenge for the trophies that were out of Auxerre’s reach. Moreover, he could achieve this by coming home, to Marseilles. He eventually succeeded in doing just that, but the road that took him there proved far more tortuous than anyone could have expected.