Between Flesh and Steel (50 page)

The swirling nature of modern tactics requiring mobility and deep penetration coupled with the presence of precision-guided munitions and air capability on both sides means that medical assets will be extremely vulnerable to planned or accidental destruction. A division commander, for example, currently possesses the capacity to exert lethal force as far as sixty miles into the interior of the enemy front. Any medical assets close enough to deal with frontline casualties are within the zone of destruction and vulnerable to attack. Since a critical factor in keeping most wounded alive is that they be reached quickly, stabilized, and then evacuated for further treatment, how this lifesaving effort might be accomplished in a modern war is unclear. The old standbys of motor ambulance, wheeled or tracked vehicles, and the helicopter are all extremely vulnerable when they venture close to the forward edge of the battle area where casualties are expected to be concentrated. Motorized transport survived well enough in World War II and Korea because the weapons used in these conflicts were so inaccurate. In the U.S. military's efforts in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, the helicopter survived well enough as an evacuation vehicle because the U.S. military enjoyed complete air superiority to suppress enemy fire at the evacuation point. In future wars, these conditions are not likely to obtain.

The professionally staffed and well-equipped medical services of modern armies are apt to face considerable difficulties in delivering medical care to the soldier on the battlefield. Again, too, the danger is that armies plan for the next war as though they are refighting the last one. In Iraq, for example, had the Iraqi Army not lost its will to fight and its air force not been destroyed
before
the ground battle began, the U.S. Army's medical assets would have been vulnerable to attack, especially from chemical munitions delivered by air, artillery, and barrage rockets. As partial consolation, current statistics show that for every three soldiers wounded only one will require serious medical intervention to save his life. The key to survival may be in increasing the medical training in traumatic first aid for all soldiers so that they will be able to stop bleeding and prevent shock. It is also probable that high-intensity conflicts will be relatively short affairs, and perhaps planners should not give too much thought to returning the wounded to the battle as they might not have time to make much difference in its outcome. Increasing the soldiers' medical training so that they can act as trained medical resources on the spot may make the most difference in saving lives. The idea is not a new one. In both ancient Greece and Rome, soldiers relied primarily on each other rather than on an organized military medical service to treat their wounds.

Fortunately, since the 1970s no nation has yet fought a modern, high-intensity, conventional war in which both sides were well equipped and had the stomach for a fight. The closest example to this type of conflict was the Israeli-Arab War in 1973. In that war, the Israelis lost almost half of their ground forces to death, wounds, and injury and almost as much of their equipment in less than twenty days of sustained combat. The loss ratios for the forces of the engaged Arab states were even greater. While both sides tried desperately to provide what medical support they could, the nature of modern battle made it difficult, and thousands died of their wounds. In the case of the Iraqi-U.S. conflict of 1991, the Iraqis quit fighting within hours of the ground attack, and in the 2003 war they quit within two weeks. In the few places where Iraqi Army units chose to stand, the superior firepower, accuracy, and lethality of American weapons destroyed them within hours. While no official death rates have been released for the Iraqi Army, senior American combat commanders suggested publicly that as many as a hundred thousand Iraq combatants were killed or wounded in less than a hundred hours of combat. Under these lethal conditions, it is extremely unlikely that the Iraqi military medical service could have done much to stem the tide of death that swept over its army.

The advances in the conduct of war have proceeded so rapidly that the military medical services can never really catch up and realistically provide the kind of survival assistance that the modern soldier has come to expect. Certainly this state of affairs has already been reached in other areas of the military arts. Training exercises conducted by the U.S. Army at the National Training Center at Fort Irwin, California, reveal time and again that against a relatively equally matched enemy, even the victor can expect little more than a Pyhrric victory in intense engagements. Military psychiatrists suggest that under those conditions, manpower loss from psychiatric collapse is likely to surpass the number of men killed by enemy fire. At the extreme, of course, no one really expects to survive a battle in which tactical nuclear weapons are used.

Maybe the destructiveness of war has indeed exceeded our wildest expectations, and only foolish stubbornness motivates us to fend off the horror of war with the delusion that we can salvage the human wreckage so that life can go on after the battle. Yet, precisely this belief makes the conduct of war seem a plausible means for resolving national conflicts. No soldier who truly thought he was going to die would venture upon the battlefield unless he was insane. The paradox is that having striven for more than six millennia to find ways to relieve the suffering and pain of the wounded, we have finally achieved the goal, only to have it snatched from our grasp by the terrible power of modern weaponry. Even so, who among us is willing to suggest that the search for saving the wreckage of war ought to end?

Abbott, S. L. “A Report on the Quality of Ambulance Service as Observed in 1862.”
New York State Journal of Medicine
82, no. 3 (March 1982): 393–94.

Adams, G. W. “Confederate Medicine.”
Journal of Southern History
6 (1940): 149–57.

Adamson, P. B. “The Military Surgeon: His Place in History.”
Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps
128 (1982): 43–50.

Agnew, J. B. “The Great War That Almost Was: The Crimea, 1853–1856.”
Parameters
3, no. 1 (1973): 46–57.

Aker, Frank, Dawn Schroeder, and Robert Baycar. “Cause and Prevention of Maxillofacial War Wounds: A Historical Review.”
Military Medicine
148, no. 12 (December 1983): 921–27.

Aldea, Peter, and William Shaw. “The Evolution of the Surgical Management of Severe Lower Extremity Trauma.”
Clinics in Plastic Surgery
13, no. 4 (October 1968): 549–69.

Aldrete, J. Antonio, G. Manuel Marron, and A. J. Wright. “The First Administration of Anesthesia in Military Surgery: On Occasion of the Mexican-American War.”
Anesthesiology
61, no. 5 (November 1984): 585–88.

Alexander, John T. “Medical Developments in Petrine Russia.”
Canadian-American Slavic Studies
8, no. 2 (Summer 1974): 198–221.

Allison, R. S.
Sea Diseases: The Story of the Great National Experiment in Preventive Medicine in the Royal Navy.
London: John Bale, 1943.

Anderson, Donald Lee, and Godfrey Tryggve Anderson. “Nostalgia and Malingering in the Military during the Civil War.”
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
28, no. 1 (Autumn 1984): 156–66.

Appell, Rodney A. “Medical Aspects of the Confederacy.”
Our Medical Heritage
73, no. 6 (June 1980): 784–86.

Applegate, Howard Lewis. “Effect of the American Revolution on American Medicine.”
Military Medicine
, July 1961, 551–53.

———. “The Need for Further Study in the Medical History of the American Revolutionary Army.”
Military Medicine,
August 1961, 616–18.

———. “Preventive Medicine in the American Revolutionary Army.”
Military Medicine
126 (May 1961): 379–81.

Ashburn, P. M.
A History of the Medical Department of the United States Army.
New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1929.

Atkins, J.
The Naval Surgeon, or a Practical System of Surgery.
London: J. Hodges, 1732.

Baylen, Joseph O., and Alan Conway, eds.
Soldier-Surgeon: The Crimean War Letters of Dr. Douglas A. Reid, 1855–1856.
Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1968.

Bayne-Jones, Stanhope.
The Evolution of Preventive Medicine in the U.S. Army, 1607–1939.
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968.

Beebe, Gilbert W.
Battle Casualties: Incidence, Mortality, and Logistic Considerations.
Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1946.

Bell, W. J. “A Portrait of the Colonial Physician.”
Bulletin of the History of Medicine
44 (1970): 497–506.

Benenson, Abram S. “Immunization and Military Medicine.”
Clinical Infectious Diseases
6, no. 1 (January–February 1984): 1–12.

Benton, Edward H. “British Surgery in the South African War: The Work of Major Frederick Porter.”
Medical History
21, no. 3 (July 1977): 275–90.

Billings, John Shaw. “Medical Reminiscences of the Civil War.”
Transactions of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia.
3rd series, no. 27 (1905): 115–16.

Blaisdell, F. William. “Medical Advances during the Civil War.”
Archives of Surgery
123, no. 9 (September 1988): 1045–50.

Blanco, Richard L. “The Development of British Military Medicine, 1793–1814.”
Military Affairs
38, no. 1 (February 1974): 4–10.

———. “James McGrigor and the Army Medical Department.”
History Today
21 (1971): 132–40.

———. “Reform and Wellington's Post-Waterloo Army.”
Military Affairs
29 (1965): 123–31.

———.
Wellington's Surgeon General: Sir James McGrigor.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1974.

Bouchier, Ian. “Some Experiences of Ship's Surgeons during the Early Days of Sperm Whale Fishery.”
British Medical Journal
285 (December 1982): 18–25.

Bowers, Warner F. “Evacuating the Wounded from Korea.”
Army Information Digest
5 (December 1950): 49–51.

Bowlby, Anthony. “The Hunterian Oration: On British Military Surgery in the Time of Hunter and the Great War.”
Lancet
1 (February 22, 1919): 285–90.

Breedon, James O. “Andersonville: A Southern Surgeon's Story.”
Bulletin of the History of Medicine
67, no. 4 (July–August 1971): 317–43.

———. “A Medical History of the Later Stages of the Atlanta Campaign.”
Journal of Southern History
35, no. 1 (1969): 31–69.

Brewer, Lyman A. “Baron Dominique Jean Larrey (1766–1842): Father of Modern Military Surgery, Innovator, Humanist.”
Journal of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery
92, no. 6 (December 1986): 1096–98.

———. “Respiration and Respiratory Treatment: A Historical Overview.”
American Journal of Surgery
138, no. 3 (September 1979): 342–54.

Brodman, Estelle, and Elizabeth B. Carrick. “American Military Medicine in the Mid-Nineteenth Century: The Experience of Alexander H. Hoff, M.D.”
Bulletin of the History of Medicine
64 (Spring 1990): 63–78.

Brooks, Stewart.
Civil War Medicine.
Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1966.

Brown, A. J. “The Surgery of Albucasis.”
Surgery, Gynecology, and Obstetrics
39 (1924): 423–29.

———. “The Surgery of Hieronymus Braunschwig.”
Surgery, Gynecology, and Obstetrics
38 (1924): 131–39.

Brown, David. “U.S. Military Medics Use Old and New Techniques to Save Wounded in Afghanistan.”
Washington Post
, November 1, 2010.

Burns, Stanley B. “Early Medical Photography in America: Civil War Medical Photography.”
New York State Journal of Medicine
80, no. 9 (August 1980): 1444–69.

Butler, Frank K., Jr. “Tactical Combat Casualty Care 2007: Evolving Concepts and Battlefield Experience.”
Military Medicine
172 (November 2007): 1–11.

Calhoun, J. T. “Nostalgia as a Disease of Field Service.”
Medical Surgical Reporter
11 (February 27, 1864): 130–32.

Calkins, Beverly M. “Florence Nightingale: On Feeding an Army.”
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
50 (1989): 1260–65.

Campbell, R. M. “History in Relation to Some Principles and Practices of Confederate Surgeons.”
Virginia Medical Monthly
94 (1967): 600–608.

Cantlie, Neil A.
A History of the Army Medical Department.
London: Churchill-Livingstone, 1974.

Cash, Philip. “Medical Men at the Siege of Boston.”
Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society
(Philadelphia) 98 (1973): 53–62.

Chamberlain, Weston P. “History of Military Medicine and Its Contributions to Science.”
Boston Medical and Surgical Journal
(April 1917): 235–49.

Chandler, David G. “The Egyptian Campaign of 1801.”
History Today
11 (1962): 117–23.

Chevalier, A. G. “Hygienic Problems of the Napoleonic Armies.”
Ciba Symposium
3 (1941–1942): 974–80.

———. “Physicians of the French Revolution.”
Ciba Symposium
3 (1941–1942): 964–74.

Chizh, I. M., and N. I. Makarov. “The Experience of Medical Support to Local Wars and the Problems of Air Evacuation of the Sick and Wounded.”
Military Medical Journal
, January 1993, 22–30.

Churchill, Edward D. “Military Surgery.” In
Textbook of Surgery by American Authors
, edited by Frederick Christopher, 153–54. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1945.

Cockburn, W. Charles. “The Early History of Typhoid Vaccination.”
Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps
101, no. 3 (July 1955): 171–85.

Cohen, William A. “What Price Body Armor?”
Ordnance
, May–June 1973, 490–93.