Authors: Robert Graysmith
Tags: #True Crime, #Murder, #Serial Killers, #Fiction, #General
anything but platonic, as had al of Leigh’s relationships with women.
“Sexual sadists like Zodiac are limited or incapable of forming normal adult sexual relationships,” Dr. Lunde told me. “And so what are the
alternatives? One is sex with dead bodies or kil ing for sexual satisfaction. Another is sex with children.” CI&I, alerted by the arrest, requested
Al en’s Val ey Springs School file and began probing for earlier signs of improper relationships with children. Police also contacted every school
where he had taught. As authorities tried to build a bigger case, Al en remained free on bail. He took to harassing a deputy testifying against him.
At night, he stood menacingly outside the man’s house. Final y, the cop rushed out and chased him away. Just before Leigh’s trial, someone mailed
an anonymous typewritten letter to a local judge. The judge brought it into the Calistoga P.D.
“Did you miss me?” it read. “Was busy doing some nefarious destardly work, for which I am wel suited. . . . Ah yes! Justice shal be done. I
had to laugh. [San Francisco Chronicle columnist] Herb Caen mentioned that Toschi was the only man looking for the Zodiac. Zodiac gave me
a car to pick up the evidence. He knew my Plymouth was sabotaged.”
A disabled Plymouth had been spotted by a teenage boy at Blue Rock Springs the night of the Fourth of July murder.
Thursday, January 23, 1975
Police drove to
Al en’s home in Val ejo and rearrested him. His mother let the deputies in and they descended to find Leigh shrieking in the center
of the basement. Live chipmunks were crawling al over him—the pets and victims he let share his subterranean room. “Squirrel shit was dripping
from his shoulders,” recal ed one cop. “He remained in our custody from that date on. When he was at the Sonoma County Jail, cel block #2B2, he
came to the attention of three Mexican guys who tried to ‘punk’ him. He let them screw him. Later, in court, the other little boy testified against Al en.”
Thursday, March 13, 1975
Sergeant Mulanax had
not given up on Al en, and wrote the FBI:
“SYNOPSIS: Subject fits the general description of Zodiac. He was born in Honolulu, Hawaii. He attended school in Riverside, California. He
is employed in Oakland Calif. He is a convicted sex offender of children. TYPE OF EXAMINATION: Evaluation of fingerprints and palm prints.
Evaluation of handwriting exemplars submitted, with evidence on file. MATERIAL SUBMITTED: 1. Two yel ow pages of yel ow material (partial
text of Zodiac messages.) 2. Red diary written by subject over period of one year. 3. Palm prints of subject of left and right hands. 4. One white
sheet containing Zodiac text, written with ink pen by subject. 5. Solano County jail arrest record.”
Later that day Al en was sentenced to Atascadero State Hospital for the Criminal y Insane.
“As for the little animals Leigh always had,” a friend of Al en’s told me, “he definitely had lots of chipmunks, and even a skunk at one time. When
he was sent to Atascadero he gave the animals to the Elnoka Nursery off Highway 12. He had an abundance of the little creatures. I remember
hating to see them caged al the time and now Leigh was going to be caged as wel .”
A sharp-eyed officer, Sergeant John Burke, noticed he was wearing a Zodiac wristwatch and entered the fact in his file.
Friday, March 14, 1975
Leigh arrived at
Atascadero and began serving his sentence. Back in 1969 he had shown his sister-in-law several pages of handprinted legal
terminology and cryptograms. “They pertain to a person who had been committed to Atascadero State Hospital for molesting a child,” he had said.
“This is the work of an insane person.” Leigh had been prescient, for he was now in that very situation. Meanwhile, al Zodiac-type attacks,
sightings, and letters ceased. That inactivity from Zodiac was extraordinarily tel ing. Only the investigation continued, grinding slowly, but
exceedingly fine. The old clock in the Homicide room in San Francisco ticked on as if measuring off three years as slowly as it could.
Meanwhile, Al en’s friend, Jim, was troubled. “Leigh cal ed me at work one night,” he told me later, “I felt sorry for him so I would listen. That’s why
he thought I was his buddy. ‘I have to go to jail,’ he said. ‘I need to come down and talk to you. I have some unfinished business, something I want to
get off my chest. I want you to be by yourself, and I want you to wait for me after work.’ I thought, ‘Good grief, this is weird. Al these stories are flying
around. I don’t know if I real y want to meet him after work alone.’ But I told him I’d wait for him. After work and a couple of beers, he’d go through his
two-hour dissertation. Another kid was working with me, Paul Blakesly. So I told Paul, ‘You know, old Leigh wants to come down and see me by
myself, and I don’t real y trust him. I don’t know what he’s got up his sleeve, so would you hang around and break a beer with me and we’l wait for
him.’ So we laid a couple of club-like things around the store just in case. Old Leigh comes down and, of course, he looked like hel . His eyes were
al red, and he had a little stubble al over his face. He had been crying his guts out. He wanted to spil the beans—that he was being investigated
for the Zodiac thing when they’d picked him up again.
“He’s going on with this big story al about Zodiac. Leigh claimed he was being checked because a bunch of girls had disappeared up the
Russian River area, and they were al on his days off or time off. The police had come down and checked his time-card records behind closed
doors. A lot of coincidences pointed to him, he said, but they were circumstantial. It seemed so beyond comprehension that I was afraid if I start
repeating al these stories—Christ! They could hang him on a story and I don’t want to tel them the wrong thing. This went on to probably nine
o’clock at night. Nothing happened and we al parted ways.”
11
atascadero
Tuesday, October 14, 1975
Allen had been
to Atascadero before, but in the capacity of a therapist. Now he returned as a prisoner. If police had comprehended how
repugnant the mental institution was to him, how terrified he was of being confined there, they might have employed a useful tool. Al en’s fear might
have been used as a pry bar to extract information about Zodiac. But Al en coped, began working in the print shop, and soon had mastered new
techniques. In the print shop he devised a plan to get the police off his back.
Back home the
Times-Herald
reported that:
“Zodiac is stil considered a possible suspect in a series of Sonoma County kil ings. . . . Zodiac threatened in one rambling letter to torture
his victims, and Sonoma County has some murder victims who were tortured to death through slow strangulation and by administering
strychnine. . . . Sonoma County’s seven young female victims [between 1972 and 1974] al were dumped in rural areas. A Sonoma County
man recently was considered a Zodiac suspect but was ruled out, according to Sonoma Sheriff’s Captain Jim Caulfield. He was a molester of
young boys, however, and has been committed to Atascadero State Hospital.”
“While Leigh was in Atascadero,” a Val ejo source told me, “I think that’s when my mother first became aware he may be the Zodiac. He wrote to
her that they suspected him of the crimes. At one point, I think my mother cal ed him there and spoke to him. She asked him directly if he was the
murderer. I believe he was somewhat jovial about it, but never admitted to the crimes. She verified that he was the suspect through the Santa Rosa
District Attorney, John Hawkes.”
Leigh, signing himself “Drawer A,” wrote Jim in Sonoma. “If Zodiac writes one letter while I’m in here,” he wrote earnestly, “then that wil clear me
of being the Zodiac.” The remark was puzzling. Everyone knew Leigh was imprisoned for child molesting, not for being Zodiac. He repeated the
same remark to women he knew. In his long outdoor chess game with authorities, Al en seemed always one step ahead. For the second stage of
his plan, he hoarded his daily medication and got a job in the dispensary. Like Zodiac, Leigh knew explosives. For his third step, he and a
companion began building a bomb to blast their way out of the prison.
Monday, November 3, 1975
In order to
pass various psychiatric tests during his incarceration, Al en boned up on the proper responses to make. He took al his tests in this
fashion: “He would not smile or show emotion and would speak in a low monotone.” He took tests as a man drugged. During TAT (Thematic
Apperception Test) evaluations, Al en was asked to make up stories based on simple line drawings portraying people in ambiguous situations.
(“Explain what is going on in this picture.”) Indirectly, his answers revealed aspects of his subconscious feelings and personality—“he has a violent
fantasy life . . . a hyperthymic (highly emotional) individual unable to establish normal social contact.”
Final y police decided to give him a lie-detector test. “A polygraph machine is only a stress detector and anxiety detector,” Toschi told me. Lie
detectors, a favorite investigative tool, are fal ible and register false positives about fifteen percent of the time. Polygraphs measure changes in
pulse, blood pressure, and breathing, but can be tricked by real y good liars.4 Even the term “lie detector” is a misnomer. Erle Stanley Gardner
wrote in his
Court of Last Resort
, “Lie detection is impossible. What is possible is the detection of stress (and in a few cases the covering up of
stress). A polygraph or Psychological Stress Evaluation test should never be used as the sole judge of a person’s innocence. As with al scientific
evidence, these tests need to be evaluated. The lie test is not permitted as evidence in court except by stipulation because it is undependable and
subject to the interpretation of the operator. As late as 1998 the Supreme Court would rule lie detectors unreliable. Leonarde Keeler, though not the
inventor of the lie detector, had done the most to refine the machine. The lie detector is in use today much as he developed it. Briefly, the polygraph
records changes in the body’s physiological responses to questions.”
Details for the test were ironed out, and Leigh agreed. “What happened,” Detective Bawart told me later, “was a guy from the Department of
Justice who was working under Fred Shirisago went down to Atascadero and they put Al en on a polygraph. That was Sam Lister—the head
polygraph guy at DOJ.” Al en entered a plain soundproofed and air-conditioned room. Lister had him sit in the examining chair. Careful y, he
hooked him up to three devices, a procedure alone that usual y causes stress in a subject. First a blood pressure-pulse unit—a sphygmograph—an
instrument similar to that used to take blood-pressure readings—was connected to graphical y record the movements of his pulse. After the blood
pressure sleeve was wrapped around his biceps, a flexible corrugated tube, a pneumograph, was strapped around Leigh’s chest to measure
changes in his respiration. Final y, an electro-dermal unit, usual y metal tubes clenched in both hands or electrodes on the hand (a monitor pinched
on a fingertip), measured galvanic changes or responses in his skin. As the prisoner’s reactions to each question were recorded on a moving strip
chart, he was observed through a two-way mirror.
Were he to lie, his heart would beat faster, his breath come more quickly, and changes would take place in his skin moisture. Pens on a moving
strip of graph paper recorded reactions. Leigh had already been put at ease in a cordial pre-interview. Leigh kept to a monotone and did not smile,
later claiming the test lasted ten hours. “A polygraph wil take maybe an hour—max,” Toschi told me. “Al en’s lying about that.” There are usual y ten
to twelve questions, and those are brief, basic, and easy to understand. Leigh was asked his first name, his last name. After each question there
was a pause of fifteen to twenty seconds. Then he was asked if he knew who had kil ed Darlene Ferrin, the Blue Rock Springs victim.
“No,” he said.
“Do you live in California?” asked Lister.
“Yes.”
“Did you yourself kil Paul Lee Stine on October 11, 1969?”
“No.”
“Were you a resident of Val ejo?”
“Yes.”
“Did you have anything whatsoever to do with this homicide?”
“No.”
“Are you forty-two years of age?”
“Yes.”
“Are you deliberately concealing or withholding any guilty knowledge of the homicide at Washington and Cherry Streets?”
“No.”
“Is today Friday?”
“Yes.”
“Have you deliberately lied at any time during this entire interview?”
“No.”
“Let’s do the test once more completely,” said Lister. It was common practice to talk over results and learn the reasons for responses. “People
overreact, underreact, have guilt complexes, are frightened, are angry,” said polygraph expert Chris Gugas. “The examiner has to take into account
variables such as intel igence, emotional stability, reaction to shock. The process in never cut-and-dried.” Thus the expert can start again with a
revised set of questions, or repeat the same questions so responses could be compared. Lister indicated that Al en had passed his polygraph
examination both times. “He is not the Zodiac Kil er,” he said. Al en cal ed afterward to tel his family and friends that he had passed and was not
Zodiac.
“And they ran Al en at Atascadero and he came up clean,” Bawart lamented. “That bothered us. Wel , we had two other experts read his charts,
and they say, ‘He was on drugs during this time.’ Our polygraph examiner, Johnson, examined the charts and said, ‘It’s my opinion that Al en was on