So, the flow of time can actually speed up in left-handed molecules and slow down in right-handed molecules. These same principles led Kozyrev to discover that common polyethylene film, like PVC plastic, could actually shield the spinning currents in the Source Field. Aluminum is also a very effective shield. This makes it a very bad idea to live inside an aluminum trailer, as you are shielding off the very fields that will keep you healthy. They will still get in, but the spin is disrupted. The amount of coherence within those spaces will be lower. Gravity will still push you down, but the level of spin, or torsion, within it will be reduced—and in our model, the genetic information in the Source Field is hidden in these spiraling forces. Aluminum is used in electronics at the component level due to its extremely light weight—and many components are also then coated in plastic. Therefore, digital watches and highly accurate laboratory clocks are not likely to respond to changes in the flow of time in a noticeable way. However, in 1993 Dr. Bruce DePalma found that the Accutron watch, which runs on a metallic tuning fork, does speed up and slow down in the presence of these fields.
14
In 2001, Dr. Hartmut Müller
15
used the spin fields within gravity to make a telephone call from the Toezler Medientage building in Germany to Saint Petersburg in Russia. No electromagnetic fields were ever used to make this call—just as Backster’s plants, bacteria, insects, animals and human cells could “talk” to each other while they were in shielded rooms. You can call from deep inside a concrete parking garage, at the bottom of the ocean or halfway across the galaxy, and you will always get a perfect real-time signal. Müller’s discovery also does not create “electromagnetic smog” that can cause cancer, headaches and other problems,
16
and this technology could be easily adapted for wireless Internet access—using the same systems preferred by biological life.
Some scientists who have studied Kozyrev’s material are willing to consider that something significant is going on, but they’re not comfortable with the idea that these effects are actually caused by the flow of time. This brings us to one of the most fascinating areas Kozyrev studied—namely astronomy. Kozyrev believed that “stars are machines” that get their energy from the time flow—and he found very compelling evidence to prove it. As Levich wrote in 1996, most of Kozyrev’s experiments in the later years of his life were “dedicated to direct detection . . . of non-electromagnetic [energy] flows from planets, stars, galaxies, stellar clusters and nebulae.”
17
What exactly does this mean? Beginning in the mid-1950s, Kozyrev designed a special type of telescope that had one of his time flow detectors located right at the focal point. As strange as this sounds, he could put a metal plate in front of the telescope—blocking out all visible light and all electromagnetic radiation—but the time-flow detector still picked up a measurable signal when he aimed the telescope at a star, or any other celestial object. This could not be possible unless he was detecting an energy that was not electromagnetic—and had nothing to do with visible light.
The light from a star can take many millions of years to reach us—and in the meantime, the real position of the star has actually drifted somewhere else. So when we look at the night sky, we are looking at the past. Kozyrev found that if he aimed his telescope at the true position of a star, which could be estimated through various means, the signal was much stronger.
18
This suggested that the waves within the Source Field traveled much, much faster than the speed of light—effectively instantaneously.
And if that isn’t already confusing enough, Kozyrev could then look at where the star would likely end up in the future, and he detected energy coming from that position as well. I know—it sounds totally crazy, but when you get new data that is strange, that doesn’t mean we throw it away. Instead, we try to understand what the heck is going on, and explain the data. Obviously, as I’m sure you can see, the comfortable, old-fashioned notion of linear time simply can’t hold up in light of this new evidence, if Kozyrev is actually right.
Indeed, the strongest energy from a star or celestial object came from its true position—defeating Einstein’s belief that no energy field could ever travel faster than the speed of light. A star’s energy then got steadily weaker when you moved toward its position in the past, and weaker when you moved the telescope toward its position in the future. The overall change of intensity would graph out the same way in both directions.
19
It’s as if the star were spread out in time, like a wave—and you could detect its position in the past, present and future all at once, just by observing the Source Field instead of the electromagnetic light waves. The closer you were to the star’s current position, the more of its energy you could detect.
This is a very significant discovery, as it shows that the Source Field is not confined to linear time. As mind-boggling as it must seem, everything is all there at once. The past, present and future positions of the star all give off measurable energy, and only the strength of the energy changes—in time. This may explain how Dr. Hartmut Müller’s cell-phone technology created phone calls that were instantaneous, regardless of the distance involved. We take it for granted that the past is forever behind us and the future cannot be known, but in Kozyrev’s science, the future actually casts a shadow into the past—which we can see and measure with relatively simple technology. Time could not behave like this if it was only one-dimensional. In some very real sense, time must be three-dimensional in order for this effect to work—and we will explore that idea in the next chapter.
Doesn’t this all sound familiar, though? Remote viewers rigorously demonstrated their ability to see events in the future before they actually happened. Dr. Daryl J. Bem, an emeritus professor at Cornell University, got a study published in
The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
that rigorously demonstrated the ability of ordinary people to predict the future. Many people have experienced prophetic events in their own lives, but often write them off as coincidence. Remember our discussion about the energetic duplicate that you leave behind in your chair every time you get up? Remember how some part of you is still sitting there in the chair, capturing light into photons, for up to thirty days? Kozyrev’s astonishing observations finally help us explain the DNA Phantom Effect. Once DNA has been kept in a certain area for a period of time, its energy will still be there when the physical molecules are moved away. Gravity provides the force to hold the photons in place—on the quantum level. Gariaev did not detect any effect from the future position of DNA, but this may simply require new experiments with these concepts in mind. We definitely see a phantom effect happening in stars, thanks to Kozyrev’s work.
Kozyrev didn’t live to see how his observations of the nonlocal behavior of stars may have extended into our own DNA—but as we remember, he did find that his own thoughts could generate a time flow that the detectors would pick up. Given all the wavelike effects Kozyrev discovered, it is clear that the energy of our DNA Phantom and energetic duplicate is rippling into our surroundings—it is not just stuck within our own bodies, even from one moment to the next as we are sitting still. In fact, it may very well be that all the thoughts we have are rippling through the entire Source Field in some way—instantaneously. Brain waves may be much more than just electrical signals—they apparently create currents that we constantly release into our surroundings. This was rigorously demonstrated in the first five chapters—and our pineal gland may well be the most important part of the brain for sending and receiving these thoughts. Obviously, the closer we are to the source of the thoughts, the stronger the signal will be. In the Global Consciousness Project, the closer any one computer was to New York during 9/11, the stronger the effects became. Our thoughts are not confined to our own brains and bodies—they have measurable effects on our environment.
Kozyrev realized that stars are sending energy through the Universe at instantaneous speeds. He then had a remarkable insight—this instantaneous energy exchange could explain the often-overlooked problem of binary stars in conventional astronomy. A surprising number of stars we see in the night sky show up in pairs. You have two stars sitting right next to each other with similar size, brightness and light emissions. It is as if they were talking to each other—there is an energetic connection between them that allows them to synchronize. From where we look, they seem so close to each other that ordinary electromagnetic fields could explain this effect. However, according to Kozyrev, the speed of light is actually much too slow to account for this communication—the actual distances involved are far too great. In 1966, at a meeting of the International Astronomical Union, Kozyrev proposed that binary stars were caused by two stars energetically harmonizing with each other through the flow of time—at speeds much faster than light.
20
So again, Kozyrev discovered that there was energy emerging from the past, present and future positions of a star. We have also seen our own DNA leaving behind a measurable energetic blueprint from where it had been in the past. Even when the DNA is no longer there, our DNA Phantom can still capture and store photons of light—it has very real, measurable energetic effects. Now that we are armed with all this knowledge, we have a practical model for how solar, planetary and other astronomical cycles, perhaps including the 25,920-year precession, may be affecting us. As earth traces its orbit around the Sun, it will leave a measurable energy behind in its position from the past. Once we come back around to the same position again, a year later, that energy is still there. That means if the energy has measurable effects on how we think and feel, those consciousness effects will also return once more. This may also be happening as earth’s axis changes position while it drifts through the precession.
With Kozyrev’s discoveries under our belt, we now have definite, provable signs of action at a distance, as Einstein called it. The position of every planet, moon, asteroid and comet in our solar system now has the potential to affect all the others in measurable ways—just as Shnoll’s discoveries strongly implied. Energy appears to be exchanged instantaneously as these celestial objects dance around—pushing and pulling on the flow of time. Our own solar system appears to be moving into an area of greater coherence—which is creating a short-term, rapid evolution of human DNA and consciousness, as we’ve discussed. The Maya calendar end-date, the expected arrival date for the Age of Aquarius and the exact time window for the coming Golden Age in Hindu scriptures all highlight the same, small window of time—circa 2012—as a key watermark for when these changes will occur. Humans gained a massive burst of intelligence fifty thousand years ago, and the Neanderthals phased out of the evolutionary cycle some twenty-five thousand years ago—right on schedule with the end of each Great Year. Our DNA has been evolving one hundred times faster in the last five thousand years than in all human history. More and more, it seems that our ancient ancestors knew what they were talking about.
How Much Can We Change the Flow of Time?
The strangest and most amazing part of Kozyrev’s work was in finding out that our own minds can actually change the flow of time. This also appears to be what the Global Consciousness Project discovered. If the human mind really can make the flow of time speed up or slow down, then what about highly gifted people? Could they possibly do things that were much more extraordinary and dramatic than what Kozyrev has discovered?
In his book
China’s Super Psychics,
Paul Dong wrote about children who are “Extra High Functioning,” or EHF. In 1992, China held an official meeting for U.S. oil executives at the Tianjin City Human Body Science Institute. This was considered a high honor for the visiting dignitaries, as they were permitted to witness something that very few Westerners have ever been allowed to see. A young girl named Yao Zheng was seated in front of a series of flower buds that were days or even weeks away from opening. The dignitaries watched her in good lighting, from several different angles. After she prayed for about fifteen minutes, she was able to speed up time within the buds—and they suddenly bloomed in front of everyone’s own eyes. Another child sitting next to her was able to teleport pills out of a sealed glass bottle, without ever opening it, and never brought any part of her body closer than one or two feet away from the bottle.
Paul Dong revealed just how far this phenomenon really can go.
There are many people with the ability to open flowers in China, and Yao Zheng is only one example. Of course, there are others whose powers are stronger. On the evening of April 1, 1994, in the Beijing Signal Corps auditorium, Colonel Fu Songshan was able to open all of the flower buds in the hands of an audience of over a thousand people within thirty minutes. . . . However, Fu Songshan is not the top man. There is one mysterious woman who, facing thousands upon thousands of flower buds, can make them all bloom instantly by saying, “I want you all to open,” and waving her hand.”
21
In
The Synchronized Universe,
Dr. Claude Swanson discusses experiments in China in which a tiny, battery-powered radio transmitter was allegedly teleported from the pocket of one individual, through a wall and into a sealed container held by another person. The transmitter broadcast a steady frequency of electromagnetic signals, allowing for a precise measurement of time to be calculated. These impressive feats were witnessed by Hartwig Hausdorf and discussed in his 1998 book
The Chinese Roswell.
As the teleportation occurred, the frequency of the transmitter . . . slowed down and actually stopped for a brief moment during the transmission, then gradually returned to the original frequency. This suggests that time itself may have been affected by the teleportation, since frequency is a measure of time. This behavior is reminiscent of what happens in quantum mechanics. If an elementary particle, such as an electron, stops in space, its frequency becomes very low and its position becomes spread out over a large area. This is a consequence of the Uncertainty Principle. If this is [what happened in] the Chinese experiment, it suggests that the teleportation process involves a quantumlike delocalization of the object.
22