Read The Roberts Court: The Struggle for the Constitution Online
Authors: Marcia Coyle
federally ordered desegregation plan of,
40
–41,
75
lawsuit against,
see
Louisville school lawsuit
“managed choice” school assignments in,
41
–42
school integration as goal of,
41
job discrimination cases,
313
,
364
n
,
377
,
379
–80,
381
ministerial exception for,
345
Johnson, Lyndon,
240
Johnson, Tim,
71
judicial restraint,
190
,
214
–15,
351
,
355
see also
precedent, respect for
Justice Department, U.S.:
firearms regulation enforcement by,
152
Office of Federal Programs of,
295
Second Amendment interpretation of,
126
–27
Seegars
case and,
136
tax division of,
295
–96
justices:
age of,
4
Kagan on role of,
316
–17
umpire analogy for,
20
,
23
,
316
–17
and Affordable Care case recusal demands,
340
–41
Arizona Christian School
dissent of,
329
Arizona Free Enterprise Club
dissent of,
328
and
Citizens United
decision,
245
in
Citizens United
reargument,
257
–58,
262
,
264
–65
in Clinton administration,
305
confrontation clause and,
17
expected tenure of,
17
–18
as hands-on solicitor general,
257
hypotheticals in opinions of,
329
investiture of,
317
law clerks as used by,
317
–18
Miller
opinion of,
345
oral arguments and,
317
Senate confirmation hearings of,
304
–7,
316
–17
as solicitor general,
236
–37,
257
Supreme Court nomination of,
300
Kansas Supreme Court,
73
Kates, Don,
170
Katsas, Gregory,
338
in Affordable Care cases,
319
,
320
–23
and
Citizens United
decision,
245
in
NAMUDNO
oral arguments,
242
in
Thomas More
case,
331
Kennedy, Anthony,
4
,
8
,
46
,
60
,
79
,
175
,
297
,
352
Affordable Care dissent of,
349
,
355
in Affordable Care oral arguments,
344
Arizona Christian School
opinion of,
328
Boumediene
opinion of,
182
–84
Caperton
opinion of,
244
–45
Citizens United
and,
245
Citizens United
draft opinion of,
251
,
252
Citizens United
opinion of,
270
–72,
277
Comstock
opinion of,
339
confrontation clause and,
17
,
221
–22
on Constitution’s supposed color-blindness,
110
,
116
Davis
case and,
186
First Amendment as viewed by,
268
–69
Gonzales
opinion of,
106
–7
Hamdan
concurring opinion of,
82
–83
in
Heller
oral arguments,
175
–76
individual liberty as concern of,
340
Kennedy
opinion of,
339
Levy team’s view of,
170
–71
LULAC
opinion of,
80
–81
McConnell
dissent of,
269
and Michigan affirmative action cases,
93
in
NAMUDNO
oral arguments,
242
,
243
on oral arguments,
170
Ricci
opinion of,
246
–47
Seattle-Louisville concurring opinion of,
110
–11,
118
in Seattle-Louisville oral arguments,
99
–100
Second Amendment interpretation of,
175
–77
Sorrell
opinion of,
326
–27
as swing vote,
71
,
79
–80,
96
,
98
,
106
,
118
,
267
,
269
,
303
,
330
,
333
WRTL
case and,
214
Kennedy v. Louisiana
,
184
–86,
378
Keyes v. School District No. 1
,
44
Kilberg, Bill,
225
Klarman, Michael,
46
Knox v. Service Employees International Union
,
345
–46,
383
Kohl, Herb,
212
Kopel, Dave,
174
Seattle-Louisville brief of,
87
–88,
92
on Seattle-Louisville cases implication,
118
in Seattle-Louisville oral arguments,
99
,
100
in Seattle schools lawsuit,
48
–49,
51
–52,
65
,
75
,
76
Kozinski, Alex,
65
Krueger, Leondra,
336
Kucinich, Dennis,
171
Landes, William,
315
Lawrence v. Texas
,
332
lawsuits, pleading requirements in,
222
–23
Layton, Frank,
172
League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC),
80
League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry (LULAC
case),
29
,
80
–81,
375
Leahy, Patrick,
304
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co
.,
97
,
107
,
308
–9,
313
–14,
364
n
,
377
legitimacy,
10
Heller
and
Parker
cases bankrolled by,
128
–30
Heller
oral arguments and,
174
on Heller’s standing,
143
Hutchison bill and,
144
Neily’s friendship with,
129
NRA meeting with,
132
in response to D.C. petition,
149
and Scalia’s
Heller
opinion,
187
and solicitor general’s brief,
153
–54,
156
on three phases of Second Amendment litigation,
131
Von Breichenruchardt and,
142
Liberty University,
282
Liberty University v. Geithner
,
318
,
331
Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act (2009),
309
Lionsgate,
205
“living constitutionalism,”
see
pragmatism
Long, Robert,
338
Louisville, Ky.,
29
public schools in,
see
Jefferson County School District
Louisville school lawsuit,
29
,
55
–56,
84
,
376
Browne and,
49
Mellen in,
56
Pacific Legal Foundation and,
49
petition for review filed in,
70
,
75
–76
in Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals,
59
,
60
,
64
see also
Seattle-Louisville school integration cases
LULAC
case,
see League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
Luttig, Michael,
20
Lynn, Mass., residential segregation in,
62
Lynn School Committee:
desegregation plan of,
62
–63
McCain, John,
199
,
203
,
229
,
261
,
265
McCain-Feingold Act (2002),
108
,
186
–87,
203
,
226
,
231
,
262
,
277
,
377
corporate electioneering restrictions in,
203
–4,
206
–7,
212
–19,
225
,
227
–28,
251
,
261
–65,
270
–73
disclosure requirement of,
204
,
206
,
219
,
224
,
225
,
227
–28
McConnell
decision and,
204
,
210
,
213
,
214
,
224
millionaires’ amendment to,
186
,
216
–17,
218
,
378
soft money ban of,
273
McCarthy, Eugene,
209
in Affordable Care case,
281
–86,
288
,
295
McConnell, Mitch,
204
,
218
,
226
,
260
–61
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
,
204
,
210
,
212
,
213
,
214
,
224
,
226
,
227
,
231
Citizens United
and,
249
,
252
,
260
–61,
269
,
270
–71,
274
as effectively overruled by
WRTL
decision,
214
Kennedy dissent in,
269
McDonald, Otis,
195
McDonald v. City of Chicago
,
268
,
302
–3,
380
Clement in,
337
–38
as phase two of Levy team’s Second Amendment campaign,
195
McKinley, William,
208
McMaster, Henry,
282
McReynolds, James Clark,
172
–73
Seattle-Louisville case and,
86
,
92
,
93
–94,
118
,
119
in Seattle-Louisville oral arguments,
99
–100,
101
on commerce clause,
288
–89
Magna Carta,
182
Making Our Democracy Work
(Breyer),
167
–68
Maloney v. Cuomo
,
366
n
Mann, Thomas,
276
Marbury v. Madison
,
165
consensus building by,
24
Marshall, Thurgood,
27
,
45
–46,
112
–13,
131
,
237
,
305
Austin
opinion of,
259
–60
Bakke
dissent of,
113