Read The King's Cardinal: The Rise and Fall of Thomas Wolsey (Pimlico) Online
Authors: Peter Gwyn
251
See pp.43 ff. above.
252
McFarlane.
253
LP
, i, 2611.
254
St. P
.i, p.311 (
LP
, iv, 4476).
255
LP
, iii, 600, a letter of Henry’s to Leo X of 20 Jan. 1520 in which he acknowledged that reform was their purpose.
256
Richard Fox, p.116 (
LP
, iii, 1122).
257
The most useful treatment is M.J. Kelly, ‘Canterbury jurisdiction’, pp.292-315, but see also Salter; Scarisbrick,
JEH
, 12.
258
Harper-Bill,
JEH
, 29, pp.2-4.
259
Goring,
EHR
, lxxxvi, p.693.
260
LP
, iv, 2483 (3), but in the end only £56,252
Os
. 8
d
. may have been paid; see
LP
, iv, app.37.
261
Many of the bishops’ registers bear witness to this but see especially Fisher’s (KAO DR c/R7/fo.113).
262
Using Kelly’s figures, the amount paid between 1490 and 1520 was £205,000, or £6,800 a year. In the 1520s it was £8,000 a year this little less than for 1445-53 when it was £8,250; see Griffiths,
Henry
VI
, p.384.
263
LP
, iv, 964.
264
M.J. Kelly, ‘Canterbury jurisdiction’, p.194;
Registrum Thome Wolsey
, p.xxvi.
265
St. P
, vi, p.257 (
LP
, iv, 115).
266
In Wolsey’s defence it should be stressed that the amount would vary considerably, depending especially on whether any large-scale visitations had taken place.
267
Ven. Cal
., iv, p.600. These figures are mainly taken from A.F.Pollard, pp.320-5.
268
See Southern, pp.111 ff., 164 for perceptive comments on this most important general point.
269
See pp.25-6 above.
270
Storey,
BP
, 16, pp.15-7, qualified in R.G. Davies, pp.55-64.
271
Richard Fox, p.116 (
LP
, iii, 1122).
272
See p.52 above.
273
Richard Fox, pp.114-45 (
LP
, iii, 1122).
274
It is slightly surprising that both in his thesis and published article Kelly completely ignored the legatine constitutions when discussing those of 1532, an indication, perhaps, of just how strong the view is that the English Church was violently hostile to all that Wolsey had done.
275
The best starting point for this recent work is O’Day and Heal, pp.13-29, but see also S. Thompson, ‘English and Welsh bishops’.
276
Visitations, c.1515-1525
, p.xiv; Fines,
JEH
, 14, pp.160-74.
277
A.F. Pollard, pp.200-4.
278
The 20 occasions in alphabetical order: Athelney (1526); Barlinch (1524); Bristol, St.Augustine’s (1525); Bruerne (1529); Butley (1529); Chester (1524, 1527); Fountains (1526); Glastonbury (1525); Haltenprice (1528); Milton (1525); Newcastle (1523); Pershore (1526); Peterborough (1528); Rievaulx (1529); Selby (1526); Taunton (1523); Wherwell (1529); Wigmore (1518); Wilton (1528). Newcastle, Wherwell and Wilton were Benedictine nunneries.
279
The formal records of the election are set out in
Registers of Thomas Wolsey, John Clerke, etc
., pp.84-8; for a detailed account see Gasquet,
Last Abbot of Glastonbury
, pp.17-23.
280
Domerham, i, pp.c-ci (
LP
, iv, app.22).
281
Knowles,
Religious Orders
, iii, pp.483-91; Paul,
BIHR
, xxxiii, pp.115-18.
282
Registers of Thomas Wolsey, John Clerke, etc
., pp.76-9.
283
Richard Fox, pp.79-80 (
LP
, ii, 730); see also
LP
, ii, 904, 906, 990.
284
Jerome de Ghinucci from 1523-1535. St Augustine’s was in the diocese of Worcester and subject to its bishop’s jurisdiction.
285
LP
, iv, 1544 for Hannibal’s letter, dated 3 Aug. 1525, but see also
LP
, iv, 1816, 1828.
286
Knowles,
Religious Orders
, iii, pp.35-7.
287
LP
, iv, 5445.
288
LP
, iv, app.85.
289
LP
, iv, app.73.
290
LP
, iv, 2083, 2277, 2412. The new abbot was called Robert Selby.
291
Inter alia Fountains
, pp.252 ff. My belief is that Elton’s interpretation of this election and subsequent events there (Elton,
JEH
, 7) is seriously misleading but space has not allowed me to develop my criticisms.
292
LP
, iv, 3878 for Haltenprice;
LP
, iii, 3171, 3189, 3193 for St Bartholomew’s.
293
LP
, iv, app.230.
294
Butley Priory
, pp.55-7.
295
Ibid, p.8.
296
Registrum Thomas Wolsey
, pp.xix ff.
297
Knowles,
BIHR
, xxxi for the best account of this.
298
LP
, iv, 4197.
299
LP
, iv, 4408.
300
LP
, iv, 4477 an undated letter of Henry’s to Anne Boleyn.
301
LP
, iv, 4477.
302
St. P
, i, p.314 (
LP
, iv, 4488), a letter to Wolsey in which Henry’s displeasure at his decison to go ahead with the election of Dame Isabel is reported to him.
303
LP
, iv, 4488.
304
LP
, iv, 4950.
305
So presented in D.R.Starkey,
Henry
VIII
, pp.97-8, but not by that other great believer in faction, Ives, for whose views see
Anne Boleyn
, pp.121-2.
306
These have to be surmised from the replies to them; see
LP
, iv, 4488, 4507.
307
LP
, iv, 4950 (
St. P
, i, p.314, n.1 for a full transcript).
308
LP
, iv, 4477, this Henry’s report to Anne.
309
Fiddes,
Collections
, p.174 (
LP
, iv, 4507).
310
Richard Fox, pp.150-1 (
LP
, iv, 3815).
311
Knowles,
Religious Orders
, ii, p.252, but I confess to having had great difficulty in finding any very satisfactory secondary reading on this subject, and I just hope that my treatment is not misleading.
312
KCA DR c/R7/fo.100v.
313
Chester, Hyde, King’s Langley, Peterborough, Spalding, Tywardreth, Vale Royal and Wenlock.
314
Lewes and Oseney.
315
For Birchenshawe see Burne. For Edmund Kirton see
Peterborough Monastery
. Birchenshawe’s most important addition to his abbey was the west front and south west porch, Kirton’s the ‘New Building’ at the east end.
316
LP
, vii, 854.
317
Lancashire and Cheshire Cases in Star Chamber
, p.74.
318
VCH, Cheshire
, iii, p.143.
319
LP
, ii, 2692.
320
LP
, iv, 546 [19], 1278.
321
The concubine being Mistress Lark; see A.F. Pollard, p.306, though in fact very little is known about her.
322
LP
, iv, 6075. For a discussion of the allegation see p.137 above.
323
VCH, Cheshire
, iii, pp.140-2.
324
Visitations in the Diocese of Lincoln
, xxxvii, pp.76-83.
325
Peterborough Monastery
, p.ix, n.2.
326
LP
, iv, 2391, Longland to Wolsey, 11 Aug. 1526.
327
LP
, iv, 4047, 4279.
328
LP
, iv, 2378.
329
LP
, iv, 2378, 2391.
330
LP
, iv, 2378.
331
LP
, iv, 3175.
332
VCH, Hertford
, iv, p.409 – and with Pace’s deaneries when he went mad.
333
LP
, iv, 4047.
334
PRO SP l/39/fo.58 (
LP
, iv, 2391).
335
LP
, iv, 3478, 4708. John Stonywell was prior of Tynemouth until 1526, when he became abbot of Pershore and Thomas Gardiner was prior by 1528. Which of these was the man who may have been intended for Spalding is not certain.
336
LP
, iv, 4796.