Read Terror in the Balkans Online
Authors: Ben Shepherd
Tags: #History, #Europe, #Military, #World War II, #Science & Math, #Earth Sciences, #Geography, #Regional
9. Ibid., 541–542.
10. In 1944 units under Artur Phleps, commander of the Prinz Eugen Division,
employed hunter group–type tactics on a larger scale, in the form of rapid pursuit
operations rather than encirclement operations. However, the source base is too small to enable the drawing of fi rm conclusions as to how successful these operations were. Schmider,
Partisanenkrieg in Jugoslawien 1941–1944
, 553.
11. Ben Shepherd,
War in the Wild East: The German Army and Soviet Partisans
(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004), 163.
12. On German anti-Partisan operations in 1943, see Schmider,
Partisanenkrieg in
Jugoslawien 1941–1944
, ch. 5; Gaj Trifkovic, “A Case of Failed Counter-Insurgency: Antipartisan Operations in Yugoslavia 1943,”
Journal of Slavic Military Studies
24
(2011): 314–336.
13. On Operation Black see Schmider,
Partisanenkrieg in Jugoslawien 1941–1944,
261–
288, 543; Trifkovic, “A Case of Failed Counter-Insurgency: Antipartisan Opera-
tions in Yugoslavia 1943.”
14. Schmider,
Partisanenkrieg in Jugoslawien 1941–1944
, 282–283; Trifkovic, “A Case of Failed Counter-Insurgency: Antipartisan Operations in Yugoslavia 1943,” 334–336.
15. Ruth Bettina Birn,
Die Höheren SS- und Polizeiführer: Himmlers Vertreter im Reich
und den besetzten Gebieten
(Düsseldorf: Droste, 1986), 260–274.
16. Klaus Schmider, “Der jugoslawische Kriegsschauplatz,” in
Das Deutsche Reich und der
Zweite Weltkrieg, Band 8. Die Ostfront, 1943/44: Der Krieg im Osten und an den Nebenfronten
, Karl-Heinz Frieser et al. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 2007), 1021.
17. Ibid., 1028–1030; Schmider,
Partisanenkrieg in Jugoslawien 1941–1944
, 545–547.
18. Schmider,
Partisanenkrieg in Jugoslawien 1941–1944
, 52–53; Schmider, “Der jugoslawische Kriegsschauplatz,” 1028. On relations between the Germans and the NDH
during late 1943 and 1944, see Schmider,
Partisanenkrieg in Jugoslawien 1941–1944
, 362–378, 397–413.
19. On the Partisans’ increasingly impressive military performance during 1943 and
increasing Allied support for them, see, for example, F. W. D. Deakin,
The Embattled
Mountain
(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971); Milovan Djilas,
Wartime: With
Tito and the Partisans
(London: Martin Secker and Warburg, 1977), 215–363; Michael McConville,
A Small War in the Balkans: British Military Involvement in Wartime
Notes to Pages 241–253
329
Yugoslavia 1941–1945
(London: Macmillan, 1986); Richard West,
Tito and the Rise and
Fall of Yugoslavia
(London: Sinclair Stevenson, 1996), chaps. 8, 9; Marko Attila Hoare,
Genocide and Resistance in Hitler’s Bosnia
(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 329–349. On Chetnik–Axis collaboration, see Jozo Tomasevich,
War and Revolution in
Yugoslavia, 1941–1945: The Chetniks
(Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1975), chaps. 7, 9; on the eventual Chetnik–Allied break, see ibid., 359–372. For a detailed
treatment of British–Chetnik relations, see Simon Trew,
Britain, Mihailovic´, and the
Chetniks, 1941–42
(London: St. Martin’s Press, 1997).
20. Schmider, “Der jugoslawische Kriegsschauplatz,” 1024–1025. For more detail on the
Italian capitulation’s impact upon German efforts in Yugoslavia, see Schmider,
Par-
tisanenkrieg in Jugoslawien 1941–1944
, 288–316.
21. On anti-Partisan operations in 1944 and the campaign’s fi nal phase, see Schmider,
Partisanenkrieg in Jugoslawien 1941–1944
, 378–397, 413–417.
22. Jürgen Förster, “The Relation between Operation Barbarossa as an Ideological war
of Extermination and the Final Solution,” in
The Final Solution: Origins and Imple-
mentation
, ed. David Cesarani (London: Routledge 1994), 90–97; Jürgen Förster,
“Wehrmacht, Krieg und Holocaust,” in
Die Wehrmacht: Mythos und Realität
, ed.
Rolf-Dieter Müller and Hans-Erich Volkmann (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1999), 953.
23. See the example of Security Battalion 242.Shepherd,
War in the Wild East: The German Army and Soviet Partisans
, 203–207, 211.
24. Theo J. Schulte,
The German Army and Nazi Policies in Occupied Russia
(Oxford: Berg, 1989); Shepherd,
War in the Wild East: The German Army and Soviet Partisans.
25. Shepherd,
War in the Wild East: The German Army and Soviet Partisans
, 147–149.
26. Ibid., chap. 6.
27. Ibid.
28. Ibid., 66–70.
29. Ibid., chap. 2.
30. Ibid., 155–157, 227–228.
31. Ibid., 81–82.
32. Three additional motivational factors to which previous secondary literature
ascribes importance are omitted:
1.
Direct experience of armed confrontation during the Time of Struggle (1918–
1920)
, omitted because available sources rarely indicate whether or not a par-
ticular offi cer was engaged so actively.
2.
Pursuit of civilian career during the interwar years.
This may have been a radicalizing factor, given that there was, from 1935 onward, a predominance within
the German army offi cer corps of men who came from the middle-class civilian
circles from whom the Nazis drew their most extensive electoral support. How-
ever, any impact this factor may have had is obscured by the fact that most of
the sample served as continuing offi cers during the interwar years in any case.
3.
Prior service in the East (Poland or the Soviet Union) during World War II.
This may have been a brutalizing factor for reasons similar to service on the
eastern front during the Great War. It is omitted because the sample offi cers
330
Notes to Pages 253–254
who served in Yugoslavia from 1941 onward—a large portion of the entire sam-
ple—would have been unable to serve in the Soviet Union beforehand, because
their occupation of Yugoslavia preceded the invasion of the Soviet Union.
33. See Appendix A.
34. On the 221st Security Division, see Shepherd,
War in the Wild East: The German
Army and Soviet Partisans
, 129–218. On comparison between the 221st and the more hard-line 203d Security Division during the second half of 1942, see ibid., 155–157.
35. See Appendix A.
36. On continuities and discontinuities between the eastern front experience of the
Great War and the Third Reich’s prosecution of World War II, see Rüdiger Bergien,
“Vorspiel des ‘Vernichtunsgkrieges’? Die Ostfront des Ersten Weltkrieges und das
Kontinuitätsproblem,” in
Die vergessene Front: Der Osten 1914/15
, ed. Gerhard P.
Groß (Paderborn: Schöningh, 2006), 393–408.
Acknowledgments
Grateful thanks are due to:
The School of Law and Social Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, for providing
me with such a supportive environment in which to carry out this study.
Kathleen McDermott at Harvard University Press, and HUP’s external reviewers, for
helpful advice on writing the book.
Andrew Kinney at HUP, and Marianna Verturro and her colleagues at IBT Global, for
helping put the book together in its later stages;
The British Academy and the Carnegie Foundation for providing extra research funding.
The following individuals, who freely provided either valuable advice, practical help,
excellent company during my archival visits, or a combination: Alex Bangert, Sonja Bern-
hard, Heiko Brendel, John Breuilly, Peter Broucek, Caro Buchheim, Philip Cooke, Tomislav Dulic´, Yvonne Ewen, Alex Flucker, Jürgen Förster, Richard Germann, Jonathan Gumz, Chris Haag, Christian Hartmann, Mike Hierholzer, Marko Hoare, Lothar Höbelt, Patrick
Hoolahan, Ke-chin Hsia, Johannes Hürter, Maria Knight, Alexander Korb, Bernd Lemke,
Peter Lieb, Walter Manoschek, Alex Marshall, Evan Mawdsley, Mark Mazower, Charles D.
Melson, Timm C. Richter, Felix Römer, Klaus Schmider, Peter Steinkamp, Geoffrey
Swain, Wolfram Wette, and Martina Winkelhofer.
The staff of the following institutions: Bavarian State Archive, Munich; Federal
Archive, Berlin-Lichterfelde; Federal Archive, Koblenz (images department); Federal
Archive, Ludwigsburg; German Historical Institute, London; Imperial War Museum,
London; Library of Contemporary History, Stuttgart; Military History Research Institute, Potsdam; Süddeutscher Verlag, Munich (images department). Special thanks are due to
the staff at the Federal Military Archive, Freiburg-im-Breisgau, and at the Austrian State Archive, Vienna, for their unfailing patience and help.
331
332
Acknowledgments
A note on the maps: the maps provided in the book are based extensively on copies of
original German Army maps, which varied widely in cartographical consistency. They are
intended to convey only a general idea of the scale and location of the events discussed.
Ultimately, the responsibility for the fi nal work is, of course, my own.
Index
Agricultural workers (Yugoslavia), 96–97,
Anti-Serbism, and counterinsurgency in
110, 136–137, 149–150
Yugoslavia, 1–3, 121–122, 255–256; pre-
Albania, 35, 72, 75–76
1914, 21–22, 255; in Great War, 29–30,
Alexander I, King, 73–75
34–37, 55, 255; anti-Serbism of Hitler, 75,
Ambrosio, Vittorio, 77, 154, 172.
See also
77, 238; in Ustasha policy, 79–80, 92–94,
Italy, Second Army
156, 180, 193, 200, 237–238, 241; in 342d
Anti-Bolshevism, in Third Reich, 2, 5, 32,
Infantry Division, 135, 141, 232, 255.
See
253, 284; in Great War, 46–49, 233–234;
also
anti-Slavism
link with anti-Slavism, 48; and Time
Anti-Slavism, in Third Reich, 2, 6, 69;
of Struggle, 54–55, 138–139; in Reich-
pre-1914, 20–21, 232, 243; in Great War,
swehr, 57, 59; link with anti-Semitism,
36, 43–45, 48, 56; link with anti-Bolshe-
63, 69–70, 117, 122, 244; in Kingdom of
vism, 48; in Wehrmacht, 67–68; and
the Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, 73; and
counter-insurgency in Yugoslavia, 185,
counterinsurgency in Yugoslavia, 98,
232, 253–255.
See also
anti-Serbism
138–139, 230–231.
See also
Bolsheviks;
Armed Forces High Command.
See
OKW
Communists, Yugoslavia
Army High Command.
See
OKH
Anti-Communism.
See
Anti-Bolshevism
Austria, Republic of, 60–61, 64–65
Anti-Semitism, in Third Reich, 2, 5, 32, 85,
AVNOJ (Anti-Fascist Council of the
251; pre-1914, 18–19, 21, 243; in Great
People’s Liberation of Yugoslavia), 199
War, 49–51, 53–54, 253; and Time of
Struggle, 54–55; in Bundesheer, 61; in
Reichswehr, 62–63; link with anti-
Bader, Paul, appointed commander of
Bolshevism, 63, 69–70, 117, 122, 244; in
LXV Corps, 80–81; appointed Com-
Wehr macht, 67–69, 251; and Ustasha
mander in Serbia, 147, 308; advocates
policy, 78–79, 92; and counterinsurgency
ruthless counterinsurgency measures,
in Yugoslavia, 85–87, 98–103, 117–118,
158, 162–163, 170, 201–202; attempts
122–124, 127, 142, 165, 186, 245, 317
to engage DangicĆhetniks, 158–159;
333
334
Index
attempts to deescalate counterinsur-
relations with Partisans, 150; relations
gency brutality, 170, 175–176, 178; and
with Italians, 150, 155, 173, 193–194, 196,
Trio operations, 173–175, 177; and
217–219, 235, 237–238; ethnic cleans-
militias in eastern Bosnia, 194–195, 196.
ing campaigns of, 150–151, 155, 185, 187,
See also
German army (1939–1945),
193–198, 213; and “Great Serbia”, 151;
corps: LXV; German army (1939–1945),
organizational weaknesses, 152–153,
regional commands: Serbia Command
238, 241; in combat against Axis, 153,
Balkan Wars 1912–1913, 21, 30
163, 165, 170, 188, 204; under Dangic´,
Baltic States, 54, 138
158, 164, 170; poor military performance
Barton, Gottfried, 251, 254
against Partisans, 158, 218, 235, 238,
Belgium, German invasion of 1914, 29,
241; relations with Germans, 158–159,
German atrocities in 1914, 31–32, 55, 68;
170, 184, 196–197, 218–219, 241; confl ict
German occupation of during Great
with Partisans, 158, 179, 182, 184, 191,
War, 45
198; propaganda of, 179, 192; relations
Boehme, Franz, radicalizes counterinsur-
with NDH, 182, 196, 199; 718th Infantry
gency campaign in Serbia, 1–3, 120–127,
Division’s view of, 184, 194–197, 205, 213;
143, 232, 255; engages with Nedicín 1943 counterinsurgency operations,
regime, 120–121, 123; manoeuvres against
218–219, 240, 325.
See also
Chetniks
Danckelmann, 120; outdone for ruthless
(Mihailovic´ movement, Serbia)
by 342d Infantry Division, 128, 131–133,
Chetniks (Mihailovic´ movement, Serbia),
140, 250, 306–307; attempts to deesca-
formation and early support, 89, 95–96,
late counterinsurgency brutality, 135;
98; initial weakness of, 96–97; alli-
biographical details, 141; and Operation
ance with Partisans, 110; and Serbian