Read Slavery by Another Name Online
Authors: Douglas A. Blackmon
the same. Davis readily agreed, and Pace drew up a contract under
which he agreed to work sixteen months to pay of his fine.
Pace was unapologetic, but denied that he had acquired or held a
large number of black laborers. He had purchased no more than
ve in the previous year, he said, al of them as favors to the black
workers themselves. They were never treated brutal y, and it was
"always understood," he said, that the men would be freed if
relatives or friends reimbursed him for the costs of bailing out and
holding the laborers.30
Next to make the trip to Montgomery were George Cosby, his
nephew Burancas, and James H. Todd, one of the strongmen used
as an enforcer on the Pace farm. The men arrived in the state
capital near daylight on June 10, having spent the night on a
Western Railroad train stranded between Ope-lika and
Montgomery. Accompanying them were Deputy Marshals Hiram
Montgomery. Accompanying them were Deputy Marshals Hiram
Gibson and A. B. Colquit , who had arrested them on Tuesday.
The defendants wouldn't talk to reporters on the day of their
court appearance. Todd had been an overseer for Pace for more
than fteen years. Burancas Cosby, a twenty-three-year-old "wide in
stock, build and ruddy face," worked for his uncle George. The
younger Cosby claimed that at least two of the blacks named in the
indictment were "unknown to him." By nightfal , al had returned to
Dadevil e by train.
As word of the arrests raced across Alabama and the rest of the
country, an epic legal and political confrontation began to take
shape. J. Thomas He in—the stirring white supremacist orator who
proclaimed to the constitutional convention two years earlier that
God put "negroes" on the earth to serve white men—was the
Alabama secretary of state by 1903. Almost immediately, He in
began circulating word that he would aid the indicted white men,
perhaps even representing them in the courtroom. He would have
none of the spineless apologia for new slavery that southern
journalists and some politicians rst o ered. He embraced it as a
return to the natural order of man.
A few southerners stepped forward to genuinely condemn the
new slavery system—but very few. One was Joseph C. Manning, the
postmaster of Alexander City in Tal apoosa County. A ery
populist, he had fought in the 1890s to hold on to a coalition of
black and white voters in Alabama, and after the turn of the century
railed against the growing national consensus that blacks should be
excluded from al political activity—even within the Republican
Party. "What has become of the ringing declaration of Abraham
Lincoln that ‘The nation cannot endure half slave and half free,’ " he
wrote to an Ohio newspaper.31 He denounced the de facto
annulment of the Fifteenth Amendment and condemned Republican
leaders for their crass wil ingness "to acquiesce in slavery for the
south and stand for human liberty in the north."
Later, Manning wrote to the New York Evening Post, lashing out
at the abuses of blacks he had witnessed and the men in his county
at the abuses of blacks he had witnessed and the men in his county
al eged to have held slaves. "It is today under the law in Alabama, a
crime for a farm laborer (black) to quit his employer. He may be
denied his pay, he may be half fed, he may be beaten with a buggy
trace but if he ‘fails to keep his contract’ then he is a criminal,"
Manning insisted. "There are black belt planters who do starve,
mistreat, abuse and beat men, and force them to break their
contract in order to get them arraigned before some demon in
white skin, but with a heart as black as hel itself; and another year
of servitude is at ached by a chain more gal ing than that of chat el
slavery to the ankle of the black man. The case of Pat erson is only
one in thousands, yes, in ten thousand….
"The Mayor of this town of Goodwater …would be
complimented in his own estimation no higher than to have it
writ en that any negro is no more worthy of human sympathy or
political consideration than is any mule, and of less kind treatment
than a good dog," Manning continued. "Here is the truth about the
South that some men of the North would ‘let alone.’ Here is the
South that should be permit ed to adopt its own course in set ling
the race problem!"32
Goodwater Mayor Dave White red back in defense of his town,
claiming that no black man or woman had ever been abused in his
court. "Unjust punishment of negroes is absolutely repulsive to me
and that no negro is imposed on when it is in my power to prevent
it," he wrote.
I defy any person to prove that any negro or white man has ever been
convicted in my court that was not guilty or that didn't have a fair trial, or
that received illegal or cruel punishment after they had been convicted.
And I am certain that I can truthfully state no negro has ever been worked
in slavery in the town of Goodwater since the day when slavery was
abolished in the sixties. It is a fact that numerous negroes have been tried
and convicted in Goodwater for stealing and have received a small ne
and a light punishment, when a white man under the same circumstances
would have been much more severely dealt with as a great allowance is
always made for the negro owing to his standing in life.33
Editors of the state's most prominent daily, the Montgomery
Advertiser, were apoplectic that Manning, an Alabama native, had
ut ered such heresy in the northern press. It cal ed Manning "rat le-
brained" and, reaching back to an archaic term for any creature that
turned against family doctrine and patriarchy, a "nest fouler."
The newspaper labeled his description of widespread slavery an
"outrageous exaggeration." The Advertiser also railed at Roosevelt's
promise at Lincoln's tomb of a "square deal" for African Americans,
and any assertion that the peonage cases were part of a larger
movement in the South to disenfranchise black men and reassert
white dominance.
Peonage was no worse than the treatment of workers in the
factories, mines, and sweatshops of the North, the newspaper
maintained.34 "These cases of ‘new slavery’ have nothing to do with
the adoption of the new Constitution in Alabama. If there is any
di erence, the mass of white people are more kindly disposed
toward the negro now than before their disfranchise-ment. These
peonage cases are simply a few here and there. There have not
been tens of thousands of such cases. We doubt extremely whether
there have been even hundreds of them in al the State in the past
twenty years."35
Nearly every Alabama leader contended the events in Tal apoosa
County constituted a smal anomaly, easily stamped out by making
examples of a few o enders. "Deputy U.S. Marshal Colquit seems
to have taken up with this county," wrote the Dadevil e Spot Cash.
"In fact three or four men of this community have been escorting
him to Montgomery where he placed them under bond, charged
with Peonage—that new word lately sprung on us which means the
enslaving of a freeman against his wil , as we understand it. This is
a pret y bad state of a airs in Alabama, but not so bad as the
northern papers would make it. These conditions wil be
thoroughly investigated and we hope every guilty party wil be
punished so that the evil wil be stopped and the blot on our state
and county removed."36
Underscoring southerners’ sense that it was hypocritical for their
region to be targeted for its racial misdeeds, residents in Bel evil e,
Il inois, went on a rampage a day after the Dadevil e editorial
appeared. A black schoolteacher named David Wyat and the town's
white school superintendent had argued over the renewal of Wyat 's
teaching certi cate. An altercation ensued. The superintendent was
shot, but not seriously harmed. Wyat was arrested and taken to jail.
By nightfal , at least two thousand whites were gathered in the
town—including many women and children encouraged to at end
the spectacle. A phalanx of two hundred men at acked the steel
doors at the rear of the jail with sledgehammers, pounding it with
thousands of hammer blows. The city's police did not voluntarily
hand the prisoner over to the crowd, but also gave no meaningful
resistance. Wyat , an educated and imposing man—standing six feet
three inches tal —waited in his cel on the second oor of the jail,
enveloped in the cacophony of the hammers pounding out his
death beat. After half an hour, the doors splintered open. Wyat was
seized from his cel and his head immediately smashed.
Dragged into the street, the mob surged around him, kicking and
stomping his body until it was mat ed in blood and dirt. A rope
was secured to his neck and tossed to two men who had climbed a
telegraph pole. Hoisted just a few feet o the ground, Wyat 's body
whipped back and forth as members of the crowd gouged, stabbed,
and sliced his torso, legs, and arms with knives. Others in the mob
gathered pickets from nearby fences and roadside signs to build a
crude pyre beneath his dangling corpse. Stil more went for
gasoline and benzene. Soon Wyat 's body was engulfed in ame. By
the time the earliest churchgoers left their homes on Sunday, June
7, the grotesque form of Wyat 's carbonized remains lay amid a
heap of ashes and smoldering wood on the street.
"The mob knew that the negro's victim was alive and had a fair
chance to recover," a correspondent for the New York Herald
dutiful y noted. "The excuse given is that the lawless element
among the negroes has been doing al sorts of deviltry, and that it
among the negroes has been doing al sorts of deviltry, and that it
was determined to teach the negroes a wholesome lesson."37
Wyat 's lynching was unremarkable in many regards. His was the
thirtieth African American lynched in 1903. There would be at least
fty- ve more before the year ended. Yet few developments caused
as much delight to leading southern whites than a gruesome racial
atrocity commit ed in the North. Such incidents proved, in their
reckoning, that northerners were just as inclined to crimes against
African Americans as their southern cousins, and that the end result
of greater racial equality like that in the North was simply more
brazen criminality and chaos caused by blacks. Many white
southerners were further grati ed when less than two weeks later a
mob in Wilmington, Delaware, seized a black man named George
White from his jail cel . White, accused of rape and murder, was
tied to a stake, forced to confess the crimes, then shot repeatedly
and final y burned.
The Advertiser could hardly restrain its glee.
In the North the negro is an alien, an exostosis on the body politic, as it
were. They do not understand him and cannot do so. They talk
sympathetically and humidly of his wrongs and his rights, shed some tears
over his alleged cruel fate in the South, and then, if he aspires to be a
laborer in the hive of industry, they turn on him and drive him out with
curses and revilings. If he resists or falls back on the sacred laws of self-
deference and self-preservation, he is either shot down or lynched. They
love him— at a safe distance.
With us here in the South it is di erent. We received the negro by
inheritance. He came to us through the generations of slavery.
Emancipation left him stranded on the shores of a new world, for which
he had no preparation and no tness. The Southern people, remembering
the negro of the olden time, when he was the faithful servant, the willing
worker and the protector of the family of his master—with all this in their
minds our people have borne with him, have helped him and have tried to
fit him for some of the duties of citizenship. We recognize in him a part of
our population a necessary worker on the farm, in the shop and in the
home, but not in any way an equal.
And for all this because the negroes have come down to us from the
good days of old; because they are at home with us, and must perhaps
forever be in some degree our wards, we owe them justice, fair treatment,
and protection in all their civil rights. Now that they have practically lost
the right of su rage, we more than ever owe them our watch care and
should throw over and around them the shield of law and justice. The fact